It's a bit clear isn't it. I don't see it as going into my notional
collected. But I feel better.
L
On Wed, August 17, 2011 16:09, Douglas Barbour wrote:
> Well, I think I know where you stand on this, Lawrence <g>.
>
>
> As a continuing statement, right through, it works...
>
>
> Doug
> On 2011-08-17, at 4:47 AM, Lawrence Upton wrote:
>
>
>> A dull and well-bored clerk
>> reading complaint emails; chewing gum; and listening on cheap distorting
>> phones to mass-produced pop dross, typing empty verbiage as meaningless
>> replies, each irresponsible, never questioning its role; and with a
>> hangman’s calm
>>
>>
>> -----
>> UNFRAMED GRAPHICS by Lawrence Upton
>> 42 pages; A5 paperback; colour cover
>> Writers Forum 978 1 84254 277 4
>> wfuk.org.uk/blog ----
>> Lawrence Upton
>> Dept of Music
>> Goldsmiths, University of London
>>
>>
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
> http://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
>
>
> Latest books:
> Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
> http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
> Wednesdays'
> http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10
> .html
>
>
> It is natural to speak of your own weaknesses so winsomely they will seem
> strengths, as if everyone else is inadequate if they do not have your
> inadequacies.
>
> William H. Gass
>
>
-----
UNFRAMED GRAPHICS by Lawrence Upton
42 pages; A5 paperback; colour cover
Writers Forum 978 1 84254 277 4
wfuk.org.uk/blog
----
Lawrence Upton
Dept of Music
Goldsmiths, University of London
|