Lancaster was also 1,38, I'm halfway through upgrading my nodes now.
Cheers,
Matt
Christopher J. Walker wrote:
> On 05/07/11 11:40, Kashif Mohammad wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am just looking into that why some sites are showing warning for CA
>> package.
>> Currently I can see that QMUL, Imperial, Lancaster and Birmingham are
>> showing
>> warning messages which should not be there theoretically. Can anyone from
>> these sites check there CA version and let me know.
>
> Was 1.38, now (as of the last hour or so):
>
> [root@se03 ~]# rpm -qa | grep lcg-CA
> lcg-CA-1.40-1
>
> Chris
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kashif
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Mingchao Ma
>> [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:19 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: CA version - any connection to what actually is installed
>> on my nodes ?
>>
>> Hi Ewan, Daniela and all,
>>
>> For a normal CA package release (non-urgent), there will be 8 days gray
>> period. The normal behavior is as follow:
>>
>> - A office release date will be set in the release.xml file, in this
>> case it
>> is 2011-07-04
>> - there is 3-day warning threshold, no warning will be raised in the
>> first 3
>> days since the office release (this change was introduced in Update-09)
>> - Warning will be raised since 4th day of the release until the end of
>> gray
>> period
>> - Warning turn to critical after 8 days gray period
>>
>> As the release day is 2011-07-04, no warning should be raised. Kashif is
>> looking into it.
>>
>> For the time being you can ignore the warning, but be aware of the new
>> released CA package.
>>
>> Please update to the new release after you receive the broadcast (not
>> seen
>> it yet) but before the end of 8-day gray period.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mingchao
>>
>>
>>> While I agree with Ewan, the point I was trying to make is that the
>>> error message even is misleading. When I read: "Detected version is
>>> 1.40" I assume it's talking about *my* system that has 1.40 installed,
>>> though that's clearly not the case, because I haven't got 1.40
>>> installed on the WNs (they are not updated automatically).
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniela
>>>
>>> On 4 July 2011 18:03, Ewan MacMahon<[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mingchao Ma
>>>>>
>>>>> Another way to look at such behavior is that the warning actually
>>> remind
>>>>> you of a new CA package available, and update is expected.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't need to know; the machines do automatic nightly updates.
>>>> I only want to hear about it if it breaks. Sending warnings when
>>>> nothing's wrong is unhelpful.
>>>>
>>>> Ewan
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> HEP Group/Physics Dep
>>> Imperial College
>>> Tel: +44-(0)20-75947810
>>> http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~dbauer/
|