On 27 July 2011 08:59, Jens Jensen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear storageers,
>
> I didn't manage to send suggested agenda items yesterday, apologies.
>
> 1. Status of LHCb threatening-to-store-stuff-at-T2s in UK?
>
> 2. Status of T2K-space-tokens - did they get them in the end?
> I know at T1, they may not have them, but it's a config
> thing, something fixable.
>
We're working on it. None of the requests for spacetokens for T2s came
with a request for an actual allocation of space - just the spacetoken
- so sites are following up with the essential request for clarity as
to how much space they want. I've had a chat to Paul Millar at DESY
about dCache - he thinks it should be possible to transfer files
already in a dCache SE into a spacetoken after the fact (sites wishing
to try this are advised to open a ticket with the developers for
direct support).
This has also become a "thing" with the PMB and the allocation group -
we are advised that, in total, non-LHC work can have up to 10% of a
site storage resource. (So, the T2K spacetoken can never be more than
this, even if they're the only supported non-LHC VO.)
> 3. Did we have a summary of the Lustre workshop at QM?
>
No, I don't think so.
> 4. NFS4 testing update?
>
Wahid has the details. I'm keen to try it out on our test SE at
Glasgow (along with the http/webdav support).
> As I managed to get away without a working headset, could someone else please chair the meeting? And you can then change the agenda if you feel like it :-) but please make a few notes.
>
I may or may not be able to make it - we had another powercut at
Glasgow, so we're all a little distracted this morning here. (This was
Scottish Power's fault, not the University's, this time.)
Sam
> Thanks!
> --jens
>
|