>>>>> "Maria" == Maria Turk <[log in to unmask]> writes:
Maria> Hi, OK yes, so with regard to removing the service ID card
Maria> association when there is an error I can see a few usability
Maria> issues cropping up here. first off what sort of errors if
Maria> it's all errors then we risk removing the association when
Maria> error is temporary which is annoying to the user. If we are
Maria> sure that its an error that is permanent then we still have a
Maria> problem because the user has specifically requested to add
Maria> this association. My immediate thoughts are if removing the
Maria> association is important because we don't want the user to
Maria> have to go through looking up the service and removing it
In the April meeting we discussed and I believed agreed that having
users go and look up a service and remove associations was always the
wrong answer. I thought we were looking at a mechanism where the user
could enter a mode where they were always prompted but the current
association was the default.
The open question in April was how to signal this to the user.
What was the resolution of that?
Maria>
Maria> then we should only ask for the association (via the dialog)
Maria> after we connect to the service with no errors. This way
Maria> there can not be an association unless all is well.
How do we know what identity to use to connect to the service if we have
not yet asked for the identity?
Also, what about simply marking the association for reconfirmation
rather than actually removing it. Effectively present the dialogue next
time with the current association selected but with the option to
change.
|