JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES  June 2011

LIS-E-RESOURCES June 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Publishers Research Consortium releases Study on Journal Article Mining

From:

Janice Kuta <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

An informal open list set up by UKSG - Connecting the Information Community <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:00:43 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (40 lines)

20 June 2011

JAM today: the PRC Study on Journal Article Mining [1]

If you have too much to read, or too much information to digest, could a machine do it for you? That is the essence of the motivation behind content mining, here including both text and data mining, examined in the latest Publishing Research Consortium (PRC) [2] study.

Headline findings in the report, which draw upon expert interviews and a survey of opinion are:

	Content mining is about to accelerate, will expand into new areas and develop further into automated information extraction and relationship analysis
	The focus is shifting from the traditional life sciences (especially drug discovery) to the social sciences, humanities, business, marketing and even law
	A majority of respondents to the survey supported three common solutions for facilitating content mining
	More content standardization for mining-friendly formats
	A shared content mining platform across publishers
	Commonly agreed rules for the granting of mining permissions
	Third-party mining requests are received by most publishers (77% of all, 88% of large ones) but at a very low level (less than 10 per annum); most mining requests come from abstracting and indexing services followed by corporate R&D organisations.
	Over 90 % of publisher respondents grant research-focused mining requests, nearly 60 % of these in all or the majority of cases. The request will be granted by 60% of publisher respondents in most or all cases if it creates traffic drivers to their sites but just over half of these publishers (51%) will refuse in all or most cases if the results of the mining would compete with their own services
	A majority of publishers do not see Open Access as a prerequisite for content mining

Eefke Smit, who carried out the research with Maurits van der Graaf, said "We found  a lot of optimism for new opportunities in mining scholarly content among all stakeholder groups. Publishers expressed a clear intent to invest more in mining and new services that will reveal deeper levels of information. We can expect many more exciting developments in this area in the near future."

Bob Campbell (Chairman of the PRC Steering Group ) added:  "This comprehensive study shows that publishers understand the potential of text and data mining.  It demonstrates that many publishers grant permission for mining for research purposes.  It is also understandable that many publishers are reluctant to allow mining if the outcome could replace or compete with their own services which can involve a considerable investment."

The report focuses on the state of content mining in the arena of academic and professional publications, journal articles in particular. Academic and professional publishers frequently receive requests from parties wishing to mine their content and face uncontrolled downloads or crawling. More and more publishers undertake content mining on their own journal content. This PRC study aims to provide more insight into practices, policies for permission requests, publishers' plans and possibilities to facilitate better content mining.

In early 2011 the authors conducted 29 interviews with people involved in content mining projects and permission handling. During March and April of 2011 a survey was mailed to all publishers on the mailing lists of CrossRef and the International Association of STM Publishers. The report analysis is based on 190 responses. 

[1] Journal Article Mining, PRC Study. Freely available on the PRC site (http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/PRCSmitJAMreport20June2011VersionofRecord.pdf ) 
 
[2]About The Publishing Research Consortium (PRC):

The PRC is a group representing publishers and associations supporting global research into scholarly communication in order to enable evidence-based discussion and objective analysis (http://www.publishingresearch.net). PRC's objective is to support work that is scientific and pro-scholarship, in order to promote an understanding of the role of publishing and its impact on research and teaching.

Media Contact:
Bob Campbell, Publishing Research Consortium 
Tel: +44 (0)1865 476118
[log in to unmask]

lis-e-resources is a UKSG list - http://www.uksg.org/serials
UKSG groups also available on Facebook and LinkedIn

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager