JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for IPV6-USERS Archives


IPV6-USERS Archives

IPV6-USERS Archives


IPV6-USERS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

IPV6-USERS Home

IPV6-USERS Home

IPV6-USERS  June 2011

IPV6-USERS June 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: IPv6 IBGP oddity

From:

Sam Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:04:51 BST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

> On 03/06/11 11:30, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > We've tripped over an oddity in our routing set up and I'm baffled.  I
> > hope this is a suitable list to ask for assistance on.
> >
> > We use BGP on our metropolitan network with private ASs.  At the core
> > are two Cat 6500s running 12.2(33)SXI1.  They run IBGP between them with
> > no sync and, obviously, no IGP on a dedicated point-to-point 2x10GE
> 
> You say "obviously no IGP" but in my experience iBGP is almost always 
> accompanied by an IGP. Can you expand on this?

Yes.  You can run iBGP with an IGP, in which case BGP will only use
routes which have already been installed in the routing table by the
IGP, or you can run "no synchronization" where it doesn't have that
requirement.  For ASs where the border routers are separated by more
than a single hop the IGP makes sense; where they are adjacent not so
much. 

> > What seems to happen is that each router advertises itself as the next
> > hop for prefixes in the IBGP.  Each router has a connected route for the
> 
> Again, not a common config in my experience; iBGP routers do not 
> normally alter the next-hop, and usually let the IGP resolve it.

As I said, no IGP and it works fine for IPv4.

> > /126 between them and a local /128 for its own interface address.  Each
> > router then installs an IBGP route for the /128 of its neighbour routed
> > via that same address.  That presumably overrides the /126 of the
> 
> Where is this /128 IPv6 route coming from? IOS boxes will list Connected 
> and Local routes for a /126:
> 
> C   2001:630:0:9001::198/126 [0/0]
>       via Vlan3709, directly connected
> L   2001:630:0:9001::19A/128 [0/0]
>       via Vlan3709, receive

s-pop2#sh ipv6 route 2001:630:3c0::3840/126 longer-prefixes 
IPv6 Routing Table - Default - 60 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static route
       B - BGP, R - RIP, I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2
       IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary, D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external
       O - OSPF Intra, OI - OSPF Inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
       ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2
C   2001:630:3C0::3840/126 [0/0]
     via Vlan16, directly connected
B   2001:630:3C0::3841/128 [200/0]
     via 2001:630:3C0::3841%Default
L   2001:630:3C0::3842/128 [0/0]
     via Vlan16, receive

> ...but I would not normally expect them to advertise the Local route. 
> Certainly our 6500s (12.2(33)SXI5) are not.

Certainly, and it doesn't happen in IPv4.  We could filter out the local
/128 prefixes on that peering, but it just seems wrong.

> Can you send:
> 
> sh run part router bgp
> sh run int <the p2p>

I'll do that under separate cover.

Thanks,


Sam

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
June 2022
May 2022
December 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
October 2020
October 2019
August 2019
March 2019
November 2018
August 2018
July 2018
March 2018
February 2018
November 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
June 2016
May 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
October 2014
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
March 2013
February 2013
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
February 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
January 2008
December 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager