On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Justin Lecher wrote:
> when aria is bringing the peaks back to ccpn, is it correct that the
> "ARIA2_NOE_Peaks_run..." has a different count of peaks than the one
> which was used by Aria? I would understand, that the peaks with merit=0
> in the original list are missing, but for me it is around 10%.
Are the other missing peaks ones where the restraints have been "merged" -
i.e. where there is a symmetry related peak providing the same restraint?
--
Dr. Brian O. Smith ------------------------ Brian Smith at glasgow ac uk
School of Life Sciences, College of Medical, Vetinerary & Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459/3089 Fax: 0141 330 4600
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
|