On 19 May 2011, at 12:25, Jeremy Coles wrote:
> Is there any wider support for Stuart to follow up with his wrapper script suggestion? In case you missed it:
>
> "... it would be good if there was a way to get the WMS to describe the details of the matching process better, for diagnosing these things. It wouldn't be too tricky to write a wrapper around job-list-match, taking each component of the Requirements at a time, and counting the matching resources for each stanza in it, and that might give an idea of where the problem lies. If there's interest, I can see if I can whip something up?"
Note that I'm talking about something that would be run by the _submitter_ of the job. And it would be on the JDL directly, so might not be so useful for those that use other wrappers.
The real solution is to put better information into the BrokerHelper message - but that's ... non-trival.
|