JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  May 2011

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS May 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Arts Council report on Contemporary Poetry

From:

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British & Irish poets <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 30 May 2011 11:37:31 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)

Jamie,

I think David has answered my question anyway, and I sort of half  
agree with him - especially with his phrase 'the inflation of class- 
specific values into universals'. My problem with that is that I don't  
see how it could be otherwise. But let's move on...

You said, "Prejudice is not the exclusive property nor a defining  
feature of the middle class". Well of course. Part of my take on this  
though is that it was the transference of particular working class  
prejudices into a bourgeois setting that set the scene for the status  
of cliched performance poetry etc. I don't want to get into any  
arguments here about the history and nature of the mainstream so let's  
stick with the performance thing... Why has my font gone small like  
yours? How do I get it back to normal? Ah done it.

You said, " Is the performance poetry scene in Britain "resoundingly  
middle class"? I haven't a clue, and I'm not at all sure what that  
judgement would ultimately mean. Does the literary establishment  
really seem to 'validate' " the cliched performance poem"?"

Well, David said the first bit, not me, but I know what he means.  
Anything said here is going to be an extreme simplification of a  
complex sociological/artistic phenomenon but the rise of performance  
poetry in Britain (I don't mean the earlier versions that took their  
cue from the 60's, and I don't mean the more intellectually sourced  
'performative' either) coincided with the whole dumming down of  
culture we associate with the late C20 - often media led and using the  
tools of 'youth' and 'consumerism'. Its most crass and obvious version  
came with the values of Brit lad culture where for the sake of being  
cool, other values appear to get upended just for fun. One of the most  
noticeable results of this was the way that well educated middle class  
young people who appeared as presenters and D.J.s on TV and radio  
began to adopt regional and/or working class accents - it might seem  
trivial but this was just an example of something that behind the  
scenes was going a lot deeper.

With performance poetry (particularly from white kids) you got a very  
similar thing - university educated 20 somethings with a smattering of  
wordsmithery found that there was an audience for their rather poor  
verse, as long as it abandoned any pretense of ambition, the verses  
staying within an acceptable range of subject (such as sex,  
relationships etc) and vocabulary and form (usually a mix of  
traditional rhyme with street meter) , while remaining either  
entertaining or, when more serious, making sure that any opinions  
expressed would coincide with the general drift of opinion of their  
audience. (I know there are exceptions to this, but in my experience  
they are a minority.) Entailed in this phenomenon, sometimes overtly  
but often quite audibly (especially in between-poem patter) is a  
putdown of other poetry as being boring and written by a load of old  
middle class men - the voicing of versions of this opinion often  
getting the loudest cheers of the night. The organizational structures  
and personnel of this scene are, as Dave says, almost exclusively  
middle class. In my experience they are often people whose knowledge  
of any poetry is basic at best - or worse, it appears to be, by  
deliberation. This relates to your final sentence below.

The performance scene has of course another main source - identity  
politics with regard to race and gender - and this remains integral to  
its self image as being radical etc, while what I've said above  
implies that it is conservative and reactionary. This makes the whole  
thing even more difficult to talk about, about how one set of cultural  
value uses another...

I meant to engage with some of your other points Jamie, all important  
ones, but I get carried away. Sorry

Cheers

Tim A.

On 30 May 2011, at 07:38, David Bircumshaw wrote:

> Jamie
>
> I'm not 'looking at the social origins of poets and critics'. The  
> problem isn't simply prejudice either, it's the inflation of class- 
> specific values into 'universals'. The A.C.E report too seems to be  
> both protesting a 'value-free' approach while presenting something  
> that is 'loaded'. I still haven't had time to absorb it fully, I  
> have a decorater's ladder over my head as I write :) , but those  
> sections I have looked at with some care have agitated a little  
> flutter or two  (I smile again, though perhaps with a hint of a  
> forced grin).
>
>
> On 30 May 2011 02:44, Jamie McKendrick <[log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
> Rather than looking at the social origins of poets and critics it  
> would help to consider what they write, otherwise we'd be stuck at  
> the stage of dismissing Orwell because he went to Eton. Prejudice is  
> not the exclusive property nor a defining feature of the middle  
> class - used in this way the term merely becomes a blurred category  
> for everything that is insidious and oppressive, and doesn't so much  
> challenge a class system, that undoubtedly exists, as comfortably  
> reconfirm it.
>    Is the performance poetry scene in Britain "resoundingly middle  
> class"? I haven't a clue, and I'm not at all sure what that  
> judgement would ultimately mean. Does the literary establishment  
> really seem to 'validate' " the cliched performance poem"? I'm not  
> even convinced that the present British mainstream has such  
> decisively "anti-modernist tendencies".
>    Class surely has to concern questions of power, economic and  
> social.  Most poets have precious little of either, but can  
> certainly allign themselves - or do the opposite - in relation to  
> the powers that be.
>    The Arts Council has a certain amount of power to dispose of  
> funds, to support or not support publishers, festivals,  
> organizations etc. It seems to me a rather secondary question as to  
> whether the compilers of the report are all middle class, as they  
> may well be, but it matters how well they understand the art in  
> question and how that understanding informs the decisions they make.
> Best,
> Jamie

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager