Dave, the point was that some tickets had only just been raised. I
think that is good, better than not. Jeff thought Ishouldn't highlight
tickets days after they were opened.
John
On 6 Apr 2011, at 10:38, "David Colling" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Just a couple of points:
>
> - these bugs have all been raised as tickets so the developers
> already know about them.
>
> - not all these are SGE specific (see for example Chris Brew's email).
>
> All the best,
> david
>
> On 05/04/2011 21:54, John Gordon wrote:
>> Thanks Simon. I removed the last bullet on more bugs being
>> inevitable from your first version (not helpful in a public
>> discussion) and sent it to NIKHEF and Maarten Litmaath. Jeff
>> Templon was outraged that I wanted to summon the developers to a
>> public meeting to defend bugs only raised the day before. I said
>> that I didn't expect them to respond in the meeting (although
>> several have already been marked solved and verified). The UK has
>> been installing and testing glexec and wants to share the results
>> with others partly so that they don't need to repeat them but also
>> that SGE sites are concerned that if they aren't addressed soon
>> then they will not be able to meet Ian Bird's June deadline. I'd
>> also like an idea of the release implications of bugs only just
>> fixed. If they wait for the UMD release of EMI-1 then they will
>> definitely not meet the June deadline
>>
>> John
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Fayer
>> Sent: 05 April 2011 18:23
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: GLexec problem slides
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is an updated version of my slides (to include comments I
>> received today), let me know if I've forgotten anything:
>>
>> http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~sf105/glexec/glexec-v2.ppt
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 05 April 2011 12:13:34 Jeremy Coles wrote:
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> The slides were removed by the mail server so I have uploaded them
>>> to the ops team meeting agenda:
>>> http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=126702. Look
>>> under "Tomorrow's GDB - review& input".
>>>
>>> Simon has filed the following GGUS tickets: 69362, 69361, 69359,
>>> 69333, 69332 and 69159.
>>>
>>> One item to be added is the one raised by Chris Brew about torque
>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>> On 5 Apr 2011, at 12:00, David Colling wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> They look fine to me. I am sending to tb-support in case there is
>>>> something that I have missed or others want to add to these.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> david
>>>>
>>>> On 05/04/2011 11:23, Simon Fayer wrote:
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find my slides about the glexec problems attached... Let
>>>>> me know if you think they need anything changing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Simon
|