That's true. All this is in raw job data but the portal only has it summarized by UserDN (for the top ten) and FQAN (I think the same). Summarising by a combination would need work.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Burke
> Sent: 04 April 2011 14:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: HEPSPEC06 numbers for GridPP metrics
>
> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Gordon said:
> > The main problem is that APEL accounting which can normalise cpu
> using
> > a site average doesn't know which are production and which analysis
> > jobs.
>
> Doesn't it store the DN and FQAN the job was run under?
>
> > The site average HEPSPEC06 is already published in the BDII though.
>
> The subcluster average in fact - so if sites create a subcluster per
> hepspec category it's accurate, but of course not everyone does.
>
> Stephen
|