On 04/04/2011 17:50, Stephen Burke wrote:
> Alessandra Forti [mailto:[log in to unmask]] said:
>> and we are trying to find a metric that expresses how best a site is
>> performing.
> So what is the argument that says that one site is performing better than another if it gets some jobs that either site could have run? If the other site is full, down or blacklisted that should count against it, but otherwise it's just chance. (Well, in practice it probably correlates with storage but presumably that's another metric.)
>
> Stephen
The amount of work done by a site without penalizing sites that try to
boost their performance applying a number of possibly tweaks to the
system. The only storage metric is the amount of disk online.
cheers
alessandra
|