JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  April 2011

PHD-DESIGN April 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Design Stance

From:

Keith Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:29:15 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)

Dear Chuck,

one of the ways that I look at stance is through categories of
apprehension - that is, when we stand, in relation to the world, as a
designer, or as a communicator etc., we assume (take on the limitations
of) a range of things.

For example, one can compare the apprehension of "difference" between
say a Design stance, a Communication stance and an Information (as in
Information Technology) stance. I have done this and produced a set of
distinctions.

(See Russell, Keith  *Design Philosophy and Difference*. Design
Journal (Ashgate Publishing)  ISSN 1460-6925, Vol 5, Issue 3, 2002. pp.
35-40.)

It is perhaps easier here to example what I am talking about in terms
of literature. Traditionally we have three historical genres: the
Dramatic, the Epic (novel), and the Lyric (poetry). In each of these, we
engage differently according to how we understand we are intended to
stand in relation to the available materials. Much of the nonsense of
post-modern and de-constructionist approaches to the novel has arisen
because critics have elected to stand, in relation to a novel, as if
they were reading a poem (lyric). That is, the levels of difference that
one might bring to a poem have been brought to a novel. This, of course,
has been compounded by novelists writing novels in the lyric mode. And,
to further aggravate the distinctions, modern films have elements of all
three genres mixed up in a trifle cake of possible stances.

We can, however, use film to example some of the key issues. In a film,
what are we to do with the background? Beyond saying the film is set in
Paris, are we to say that the director intended the green VW driving by
as some kind of comment on the action? Or, are we to question whether
the green VW is there because of a product placement that is just
fanservice, or maybe it is product placement that is intended to make a
comment on the lives of the characters?

In a novel, the green VW is only there because the author put it there,
maybe incidentally. In a poem, the green VW is there as a possible
symbol, metaphor for all kinds of things - the very sound of VW could
have all kinds of links with other sounds etc.

We can readily understand these different stances and hence we can say
a film or novel is very poetic and a novel or poem is very dramatic, and
a drama or poem is very epic.

Following on this illustration of our general awareness of stance, we
can say an object is very designerly, by which we mean that the stance
of the designer has over-loaded the stance of design. And so on.

So, when we take the stance of a designer, how do we apprehend
differences? In my paper, mentioned above, I take a rather logical and
material approach. In IT, the differences need to be no more than binary
and repeatable with very low levels of redundancy. In design,
differences must be materially stable, repeatable and have a higher
level of redundancy than those to be found in IT.  In the case of
communication, we need all the above plus very high levels of
redundancy.

We apprehend the logical and material possibilities of difference
according to our social organization of stances.  

Hope these comments are useful and all the best with the project

keith

 
>>> Charles Burnette <[log in to unmask]> 04/01/11 4:41 AM >>>

Harold said:
"Design is a stance I believe, an approach to the human condition just 

as science, religion or politics are, and not a discipline."

Derek replied:
I like that notion of design as a stance. I'm going to think about. it

I'm delighted that the concept of "design stance" has been introduced 

to the list:

We owe the terms to Daniel Dennett, the American Philosopher.  He  
defined *Design stance* as behavior in which
one predicts that an entity is designed as they suppose it to be and  
will operate according
to that design. (1) I have adapted his broader philosophical system  
based on interpreting things from an "intentional stance" as the  
motivating orientation focusing all modes of purposeful thought, and  
design thinking in particular. I believe that the design stance is  
primarily a way of focusing intentional thought and action to produce  

meaningful and appropriate expressions, artifacts or behaviors  
relevant to intentional goals regarding a situation or context of  
concern.  Formulating an appropriate proposal, message, or artifact  
regarding a focal  situation requires a "design stance" regarding the 

situation. However, the products of other intentional modes must be  
interpreted, synthesized and expressed  and synthesized subject to a  
Formative intent within a broader framework of intentional  
considerations.  Both Dennett's system of distinctions and those  
particular to design thinking are discussed in the papers;   
"Intentionality in Design" and "A Theory of Design Thinking" that can 

be found at http://independent,academia.edu/charlesburnette.

I'd really appreciate your thoughts about how  a "design stance"  
becomes motivated and pursued. It has become a fundamental building  
block for my theory of design thinking. It  is too important an idea  
to be left without adequate formulation.

Thanks,
Chuck

1) Dennett, D. 1996. Kinds of Minds, NY: Basic Books

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager