On 4/18/11 3:51 PM, "Sam Hartman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>The fastest way to get the OID would be to ask the WG for objections
>(probably get none)
>ask the ADs for an OID, and then ask MIT and Heimdal to ship.
Can we get that on a TODO list for somebody? I could, but I probably don't
know the details well enough to ask.
>It would probably be August or so before it was shipping and add
>standard OS uptake of new versions delay before you could depend on it.
>For Moonshot we've been assuming that we can no longer guarantee
>mechglue changes that we need will be available.
Sure.
I just checked in support for using composite names with autoconf tests.
It at least compiles if the symbol is available, so hopefully it will just
work once there's support.
-- Scott
|