Hola Arnau,
>> Well, in principle YAIM could first verify the configuration as it does when
>> invoked with "-v" instead of "-c", but that would add a significant overhead
>> and still not catch all errors (some actions may fail when actually tried).
>>
>> Maybe it just could warn that the configuration is left invalid on error exit?
>
> Well, I don't understand why running yaim as a dummy/noexistent nodetype
> still does some action.
> IMHO it should left the node as it was and drop an error.
I have opened a bug/RFE with further details about the matter:
https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?81664
> *In some "critical" situations, we run some commands via vxargs
> (parallel ssh). I 've noticed that if the host is heavy loaded,
> vxargs is not passing all the params correctly (or the node does
> not collect them well), and the node gets misconfigured in some way
> (not all the node, but some parts).
Aha! "Please change YAIM to play nice with this broken software..." :-)
Seriously, your real problem lies with that package!
|