On 20 April 2011 16:20, Govind Songara <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Earlier I noticed some site already running DPM 1.8.x headnode or may be
> they having test setups.
>
> When are you planning to upgrade headnode, i can wait for feedback if it not
> more than 1 week.
So, Edinburgh, Durham and Glasgow all have DPM 1.8.0 headnodes.
As far as we can tell, they're doing fine.
Sam
>
> We will try to go first with dpm 1.8.x pool node and then decide further
> actions.
>
> Thanks
> Govind
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 April 2011 15:37, Govind Songara <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We are preparing to install DPM pool nodes on our new Dell kit.
>> >
>> > Our existing setup is
>> > Head-node & pool nodes:- DPM 1.7.3.1.
>> > Worker node:- glite-WN -3.2.9-0 with dpm 1.7.4-7
>> >
>> > New worker node:- glite-WN 3.2.10, with dpm 1.8.0-1/1.7.4-7
>> >
>> >
>> > Can we install DPM 1.8.x on new pool nodes.
>> > We would like to know if there any compatibility issues with different
>> > versions.
>>
>> I believe this should be fine, but haven't tested it in that direction.
>>
>> >
>> > We plan to upgrade DPM to 1.8.x once it is fully recommended by storage
>> > experts.
>> >
>>
>> I'm happy for you to do that now (although, I'd do the head node
>> upgrade first if you could...)
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> > Cheers
>> > Govind
>> >
>> >
>
>
|