JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  March 2011

OCC-HEALTH March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...

From:

Stephanie McGauley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:20:12 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (399 lines)

quite often i use the following

"on further review with the employee there are no further changes to  
health despite their perceptions with symptoms therefore following  
careful assessment and history, occupational health has nothing  
further to add or recommend to the employer"

usually that works

regards

steph
On 2 Mar 2011, at 13:55, Dawn wrote:

> David,
>
> Thank you for your kind and thoughtful reply. I have reflected more  
> since my post and agree I will consider the 'google effect'... I  
> believe I did act correctly and that I cannot manage someone else's  
> erractic behaviour ( they want to see a report, then they don't,  
> then they do) he could have accessed the report according to the  
> information furnished to him when he consented to a report being  
> compiled. he did speak with his Gp and knew what was written and it  
> has in no way affected him. He is fit for role and no changes have  
> been required.
>
> I have learnt to constantly ask for consent and be sure to explain  
> fully why its needed and document this every time. I cannot go  
> wrong this way and it will mean I can avoid questioning myself so  
> much....I realise I am not the problem. Since then he has been seen  
> and his concerns discussed and he has gone away for now... I have  
> doubt he will be back...He is addicted to ill health symptoms!
>
> D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of David Wadsworth
> Sent: 02 March 2011 10:51
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Dawn, sorry for the delayed reply. I have been on holiday.
> I read with great interest this thread and sympathise with you,  
> with regards your frustration this man causes.
>
> Sandra’s concerns with regards accessibility of the thread to the  
> general public made me sit up and think carefully, she has  
> certainly reminded me of the power of google. (Thank you Sandra,  
> really valid comments that we all must be reflecting on)
>
> My advice with this chap and future cases would be to reflect on  
> how the case is affecting you personally. Is this guy really worth  
> all the angst he is causing you. Not sure who wrote this, but I  
> agree with others when they suggest just playing the game with him.  
> You are not going to change these people even though we all want to  
> fight for what is right. I have been accused of being inactive,  
> unprofessional and cynical when I have previously suggested a “go  
> with the flow” approach to similar problems posted here, but my  
> health and its effect on my family is my most important goal in  
> life, and so I try not to worry about things (his character/ 
> societal benefit) I cannot change, whilst remaining professional  
> through out.
>
> Maybe we should all have CBT to help us deal with these cases!
>
> Good luck with him and be sure if you did crack this case, there is  
> another one waiting around the corner!
> Best wishes
> David
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]  
> On Behalf Of Roberta Hanlon
> Sent: 26 February 2011 22:04
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> I think he has close relatives in N. Ireland too. Must be a big  
> family as I’m dealing with one at the minute who keeps saying ‘I’ve  
> worked here longer than anyone else they owe me’.....lol...
>
> Roberta
>
>
> From: Dawn
> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 10:56 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Frank no not the same one... but we all get one occasionally!  
> Sounds like his brother....! I spend a lot of time being as  
> positive as I can to help find a common pathway to support  
> employees to remain at work. Some work with you some don't. I just  
> try my best. I have always said to employees and HR,H & S and  
> managers that it is a team effort and we ALL work together to get  
> the best result and that if we do it will work. If anyone of those  
> factors don't put in then it will affect the result. I try to  
> promote an honest and open dialogue and have found my workplace  
> great. The only tim it has failed is whne people have had hideen  
> agendas!
> Thanks for your comments they were very helpful. D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of Frank Oakes
> Sent: 26 February 2011 10:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> I agree Dawn.  If a colleague can’t seek advice and blow off a  
> little steam in the process now and then what is the point!
>
> If this guy is on Merseyside then I know him too J
>
> While we all get frustrated with these people taking the p**s  
> (sorry mother!), don’t take it personally.  I got to a point where  
> I treated it as a game with the obvious scammers, I played within  
> the rules of my profession but remember 9 times out of 10 we have  
> seen this before, we know the scams so I made a point of being  
> extra vigilant in recording everything.  These people detract us  
> from helping the people who really need us, they take up so much of  
> our time.
>
> My guy claimed a rash that no one could ever see, was disabled from  
> an accident with a previous employer and had restrictions placed  
> upon his role and complained when I reminded his manager that why  
> place him on restricted duties then allow him to do the duties he  
> is restricted from on overtime.  He wove a web of deceit but it all  
> came out in the end.  The companies solicitor were amazed how much  
> I documented in ‘our chats’.  They found the fact that he was able  
> to help his brothers roofing company at the weekends, fit new roofs  
> to houses (up ladders and on the roof) yet he claimed his ‘day job’  
> was effecting his health.  Game on.
>
> Frank
>
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]  
> On Behalf Of Dawn
> Sent: 26 February 2011 09:56
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Thanks Sharon,
>
> I have seen a lot worse things bantered on here and I thought this  
> was an OH support forum. I have not said where I am in the UK or  
> what industry or anything that can identify him. Can't believe this  
> is some peoples way of supporting colleagues....Thanks to those who  
> have given advice and for those who feel superior to the rest and  
> make no mistakes lets hope it continues like that for you all but  
> if you ever need support remember what you have written to me. In  
> an OH role it is isolating enough without comments I have seen  
> today. There is a saying 'walk a mile in my shoes before you judge'...
>
> D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of sharon naylor
> Sent: 26 February 2011 06:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Might not have been the best idea in the world but this (IMHO) is  
> an example of a colleague who has obviouisly been rattled by a  
> difficult case, and wanted some support and guidance . Which one of  
> us hasnt at at least one point in our career?
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:10:22 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Dawn, I am appalled by the language you have used to describe this  
> case on a public forum, it is unprofessional and potentially goes  
> against our code of conduct. Regards karen Sent from my BlackBerry®  
> wireless device
> From: Dawn <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:33:17 -0000
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> ReplyTo: Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just to say I didn't send the manager the GP report just feedback  
> the relevant information as the issues raised had been related to H  
> & S potential exposure and potential risk to health ie breathing  
> and skin. The GP had said nothing significant to pass to employee  
> hence why I did not see him as he was deemed fit for role with no  
> adjustments restrictions.
>
> The glass of wine has been had....
>
> It grates to have poeple who just play the odds to make money when  
> there are some people who have genuine wk related issues where real  
> negligence is caused and people like him are using the no win no  
> fee bloodhounds to fund these claims.I came into OH as my Dad died  
> of Mesothemioma and wanted to educate and improve peoples health  
> but scumbags like this make me mad!
>
> I avoid contact with him as much as possible as he sees it as  
> confirmation he has issues. He has but they are not wk related.....
>
>
> Thanks for your comments it helps. Yes I had consent verbal written  
> more than once.... he had a chance to see report yet refused. He  
> switches and changes his mind back and forth so much I can't keep  
> up. The story keep changing.
>
> Ta all Have a good un...
>
> Dawn
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of Sarah Witwicka
> Sent: 25 February 2011 19:39
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
>
> Oh, blimey.  Dawn, HUGE apologies if I've got the wrong end of the  
> stick.
>
> Chilling with a glass of wine does sound like great advice :-)
>
> Happy weekend everyone.
>
> S
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:06:49 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> oooo can you feel the tension rising in the initial mail? Is ar** a  
> technical term I wonder? Bless you this did make me giggle, but in  
> a sympathetic way.
>
> The way I read this is that you prepared a report based on your  
> findings and the further reports you got from Prof C and the GP?  
> You gave this to the manager. I cant imagine that you would have  
> sent the manager the medical reports? Most OH get people back in to  
> discuss the contents of any FME before they send out a further  
> report (this is contained within faculty /BMA guidance) so  
> technically I suppose he has a gripe, its also good practise to  
> tell people what you are going to say, so the contents of your  
> report arent a shock but if there was nothing to discuss then I  
> cant see that its a hanging offence, maybe just an oversight (and I  
> can understand why you perhaps would want to avoid meeting with him  
> unless absolutely necessary)
>
> Let him get on with the grievance, I have had so many taken out  
> against me I have lost count (and all of them from people who sound  
> like they could be related to your guy). What does he want as a  
> result of this process? I believe he has to say what outcome he  
> wants, he probably hasnt thought of one yet. My advice, chill, have  
> a glass of wine, on Monday make sure all documentation /notes are  
> up to speed, talk to the RCN, look at the faculty guidelines, come  
> home Monday night and chalk it up to experience. I dare say this  
> wont be your last case along these lines..............
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:45:20 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Did you send the man's manager the GP report?
>
> The way it's done where I work is to get the client back in once  
> the GP report has been received.  The report is then reviewed with  
> the client and a follow-up report provided to the manager.  The GP  
> (or specialist) report doesn't get passed on to the manager.
>
> I would imagine if the GP report has gone to the manager,  
> theoretically, the report could then be passed to the company's  
> insurer who may in turn be looking at reviewing potential payouts  
> to the man...
>
> S
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:27:35 +0000
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] EMPLOYEE WHO HAS TASTED BLOOD...
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Wanted to see what you make of this.
> >
> > Man works for co for 5 years has been poor in attendence with  
> various issues none which prove ongoing or serious though he is a  
> drama queen and loves to have a potential illness.
> > Since approx 20 months ago and before I came he started firstly  
> saying he had a wk related rash, then it came and went. put his  
> hand in a small puddle of diluted detergent 50:1 ratio that he  
> claimed caused burns ( he walked past 3 basins he could rinse it in  
> to show his manager before he rinsed it) it was neither burns only  
> red and no lasting damage but no photos taken. then he decided to  
> up the anti to say he smelt something in his work area, felt dizzy  
> and stumbled outside and threw himself on his chest saying he  
> couldn't breath. An overzealous first aider initiated a crisis and  
> the whole caboodle of fire,ambulance and police turned up!. He went  
> to hospital as the ambulance was there and was discharged home less  
> than 2 hours later as fit.
> > I got Paul Cullinan to see him who thought as I do he's 'strange  
> man' and he has been cleared as fit and well. I wrote as good  
> measure to ask his GP if he had any ongoing health issues that  
> might affect him at work. Answer was no but he did say that he had  
> had wk related dermatitis in the past which he didn't disclose to us.
> > He put in two claims against co and they have paid £2000 out for  
> the hand so far. He loves it and is boasting. I would fully support  
> him but he is a chancer and the co is really a good one but has no  
> control over the payout from insurer. He is now waiting for his  
> next claim.
> > He put in a letter re his manager at Xmas saying he felt  
> victimised and today he has sent a letter saying he weants to raise  
> a greivance against me as I had not gone through the GP letter with  
> him before I sent out the report to his manager who then went  
> through it with him.
> > The report from me basically is he is fit and no adjustments  
> restrictions as there was nothing from Paul C or GP. Had their been  
> concerns I would have expalined this to him.
> > He signed my referral that states I would send a report and the  
> consent form which says he has the chance to see the GP report. The  
> GP report said he was offered a copy and to see it in the letter  
> and declined them.
> > Can't see how I can advise his manager on his H & S at wok  
> without telling her and she was discussing the results with him so  
> it was hardly a secret and nothing came of it anyway.
> >
> > Have I missed somthing. I always state everytime I see anyone  
> that I need their consent and ask for it before I proceed. In most  
> cases they even know the report before its sent as I do it with  
> them there so its all in the open. Its on the notes and they signed  
> the referral and consent.....what more can you do. If theres  
> nothing to change would you have seen him???
> >
> > Just he's such a ar** wondered what you think.....
> > Dawn
>
>
>
> ******************************** Please remove this footer before  
> replying.
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ 
> filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>
> ******************************** Please remove this footer before  
> replying.
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ 
> filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>
> ******************************** Please remove this footer before  
> replying.
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ 
> filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
> Oxford Bus Company email notice. This email is confidential and for  
> the intended recipient only, if you are not the intended recipient  
> please call 01865 785400 City of Oxford Motor Services Ltd. Trading  
> as The Oxford Bus Company. Company registration number 91106 The Go- 
> Ahead Group plc is registered in England No. 2100855. Registered  
> office: 3rd Floor, 41-51 Grey Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 6EE.  
> This email is sent subject to our email disclaimer which can be  
> accessed here www.go-ahead.com/emaildisclaimer.htm
> ******************************** Please remove this footer before  
> replying.
>
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ 
> filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>
> ******************************** Please remove this footer before  
> replying.
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ 
> filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>

********************************
Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager