...how about "output"?:
"My entire process/practice/orientation [probably best to wrap it all up
under "output"] is part of the same desire base that drives my life:
balance. + I don't mean a diluted pop_psychology concept of balance, I mean
the idea of operating from a cluster of entangled principles that allow 4 a
sustainable>integrated existence that takes *all* of life's [my life +
others] variables [context, environment, perception, etc] into account. As
empathy is a *crucial* component of a balanced life, overt competition +
Capitalistic pursuits sit fundamentally ill-@-ease with me. That's not to
say this system is static [it's far from it] + that it doesn't allow for
radical spiking in terms of phenomenological flow/activity. For eg, I've
been extremely careful my entire career to avoid falling into a careerist
trap where all that's done is focus on wurk [to the extent that other life
elements become impoverished/permanently skewed]. In light of this,
separating out distinct creative modes ["poetry">"code">"theory"] seems
almost pointless in terms of my output: I also acknowledge the majority of
people need to do so as labels = comfort. My adherence to [Relational]
Holism <http://abyss.uoregon.edu/%7Ejs/glossary/holism.html> is so
encompassing that it's difficult to tease my output into various
compartments that allow for examination + boxed/easy comprehension [same as
with my entire life orientation:)]. So, to try to answer your question: my
output is continuous[ly morphing] = intertwining through my entire existence
state...without getting too wafty, let's just say
me+myoutput=curiosity_based+play_loaded+empathetically
challenged+[reuse|cycle]adaptive?"
from: http://badatsports.com/2011/mezangellen-w-mez/
chunks,
mez
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Perhaps we need a new word then.
>
>
--
Reality Engineer>
Synthetic Environment Strategist>
Game[r + ] Theorist.
::http://unhub.com/netwurker ::
|