On 15 March 2011 10:03, Frankie Roberto <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Andy wrote:
>> * Users can't fix errors; I mistakenly (thanks to auto-complete
>> followed by too-rapid use of the return key) categorised something as
>> "cameras" when of course I meant a singular "camera".
> Ha, yes, I've done that once or twice too.
>
> I've turned off autocomplete for now - not sure if the benefits outweigh the
> drawbacks of this, but will see how it goes.
>
> Ideal solution is probably to add an 'undo' link to the next page, so that
> you can quickly go back and correct a classification.
I'd prefer an "undo" option to loosing autocomplete.
>> * When an item is categorised (or tagged); please display that
>> category (or tag) on the item's
>> page.
> Good idea, thanks. I've done this very simply, eg see:
> http://what-is-this.heroku.com/things/31176
Thank you.
> (with rel="tag" too - although
> strictly speaking I think the classification page URLs would have to end in
> the tag name for the microformat to work correctly?).
Yes; they would. I should have spotted that. Perhaps you could use
human-readable links, and re-write/ redirect them?
>> * I'm not clear whether you're allowing objects to be tagged more
>> than once
> Not yet. Thought it'd be better to get one tag for as many objects as
> possible instead. Plus, I reckon most things have a single classification
> which adequately describes them. But, I might reconsider.
I'm sure they do have such a label; but I'm less convinced that people
will always choose it ;-)
[Other points noted]
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|