Is that "-si" option is newly added to the dpm-qryconf? I get
"dpm-qryconf: illegal option"
-Santanu
Peter Gronbech wrote:
>
> This is the old problem of Tb vs TiB I think see
>
> Dpm-qryconf –si
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Peter Gronbech Senior Systems Manager and Tel No. : 01865 273389
>
> SouthGrid Technical Co-ordinator Fax No. : 01865
> 273418
>
> Department of Particle Physics,
>
> University of Oxford,
>
> Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *From:* GRIDPP2: Deployment and support of SRM and local storage
> management [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
> *Santanu Das
> *Sent:* 10 March 2011 17:52
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* disk-space reported by DPM
>
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> Why the total capacity of disk-space reported by the dpm-listspaces
> and dpm-qryconf is different?
> For us, it's reported as 101T and 92T, respectively:
>
> [root@serv02 ~]# dpm-listspaces | sed -n '/POOL/,/ /p'
> POOLS:
>
> dpmCam_2007
> CAPACITY: 101.19T RESERVED: 93.40T UNAVAIL (free/used): 0.00/0.00
>
>
>
> [root@serv02 ~]# dpm-qryconf | sed -n '/POOL/,/ /p'
> POOL dpmCam_2007 DEFSIZE 200.00M GC_START_THRESH 0 GC_STOP_THRESH 0 DEF_LIFETIME 7.0d DEFPINTIME 2.0h MAX_LIFETIME 1.0m MAXPINTIME 12.0h FSS_POLICY maxfreespace GC_POLICY lru RS_POLICY fifo GIDS 0 S_TYPE - MIG_POLICY none RET_POLICY R
> CAPACITY 92.04T FREE 5.27T ( 5.7%)
>
>
>
> So, what we actually have, according to DPM?
>
> Cheers,
> Santanu
>
>
>
>
>
|