Hello,
Can you tar up the input and output files for the subjects that show this behaviour ( along with any logs ) and upload them to:
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
and let me know the 6-digit reference number?
Many Regards
Matthew
> Dear FSL,
>
> I'm running a group comparison twice, for two data sets with 10
> patients in each. Each data set contains 5 of the same subjects, i.e.
> group 1 has 5 randomly chosen subjects and 5 subjects that will be the
> same as 5 subjects in group 2. Group 2 has 5 of the same subjects as
> group 1, and 5 randomly chosen subjects that are not the same as any
> in group 1.
>
> Group 1:
> tbi_y_125_FA
> tbi_y_129_FA
> tbi_y_130_FA
> tbi_y_131_FA
> tbi_y_132_FA
> tbi_y_134_FA
> tbi_y_135_FA
> tbi_y_136_FA
> tbi_y_137_FA
> tbi_y_138_FA
>
> Group 2:
> tbi_y_134_FA
> tbi_y_135_FA
> tbi_y_136_FA
> tbi_y_137_FA
> tbi_y_138_FA
> tbi_y_139_FA
> tbi_y_143_FA
> tbi_y_144_FA
> tbi_y_145_FA
> tbi_y_148_FA
>
> For some reason, when I run a TBSS analysis separately on these two
> data sets, there is a slight variance in TBSS results for the 5
> subjects that are the same in both groups. Why is this the case when
> all subjects are registered to the same standard template? I used the
> tbss_2_reg -T and tbss_3_postreg -T option in each case.
>
> Thanks,
> Charvi
>
|