Dear All,
I do not like that idea. As Wayne says, it is a change in philosophy.
Rather I would say that if there is interesting information in the
original data, we should import it into the data model. Strictly speaking,
processing information should go into a Method object, linked by the
processMethod link. That would be best, but I guess it would require some
support in the Analysis user interface, so that people could actually get
hold of the information. If that is unrealistic, we might put the script
in the DataSource.details field.
Yours,
Rasmus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> An interesting idea. I should say that once a spectrum is imported from any
> format into Analysis then Analysis doesn't really care where it came from, in
> particular it doesn't know store what the original source was. So this would
> require a slight change in philosophy. Also, one could then think about
> storing all the Bruker metadata for Bruker files (but I'm not sure I want to
> go down that route, because that is more complicated).
>
> Wayne
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Justin Lecher wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> when saving binary data inside a project, for the azara format only the
>> spc is saved. Is it possible to also save the par file? Nicely azara
>> stores the complete processing script in the par file during processing.
>> This important information about HOW the spectrum was processed gets lost.
>>
>> Thanks jsutin
>> --
>> Justin Lecher
>> Institute of Complex Systems
>> ICS-6 Structural Biochemistry
>> Research Centre Juelich
>> 52425 Juelich, Germany
>> phone: +49 2461 61 2117
>>
>>
>>
>
|