On 21 March 2011 11:23, John Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Mandatory.
This is interesting. The belief of the DTeam group was that it was
possible that the position was "Mandatory for running analysis from
any VO", not "Mandatory".
Can you confirm that the actual position is "Mandatory, even if you're
only running Production"?
Sam
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Winnie Lacesso
> Sent: Mar 21, 2011 10:24 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: glexec - mandatory or not?
>
>
>
>
> Happy Spring!
>
> There's conflicting data about having to or not.
>
> Some time ago someone said:
>
>> If you chose not to run glexec then you could opt out of user analysis
>> jobs and just get production jobs. Well that's the theory any way.
>
> Someone else said to me (Bristol) w.r.t our use of HPC:
>
>> The other option is to run glexec but not in root suid mode that would
>> give logging info but your site security policy may not agree with
>> running work from one user as another (the pilot).
>> The vo mainly affected is atlas which you are not so bothered about.
>
> True.
>
>> Lhcb mainly intend to do analysis at tier 1s so may also be less
>> bothered. I don't know the cms position but you will have a better idea
>> on that.
> Have placed query on that.
>
> Can the mandatory/not question of glexec be clarified?
>
|