Hi,
It seems that the script did not complete - check the log files and make sure that you use a proper design matrix and contrast file.
hth
Christian
On 4 Mar 2011, at 23:56, Amy Zhong Sheng Zheng wrote:
> Thanks for the response. If I want to compare to see if there's significant difference between the two groups for some of the IC components, how would I be able to do that? To get outputs like these for each component: dr_stage2_ic0001.nii.gz dr_stage3_ic0001_tstat1.nii.gz
> dr_stage3_ic0001_tfce_p_tstat1.nii.gz
> dr_stage3_ic0001_tfce_corrp_tstat1.nii.gz
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi - one set of images are zstat versions of the output (dividing the 'effect size' by the residuals) and the other set are the 'effect size' (like PE inFEAT).
> Cheers.
>
>
> On 4 Mar 2011, at 02:17, Amy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm fairly new to using dual regression. I ran dual regression on my two sets of model-free data each with 3 subjects using concat ICA to compare the 2 groups (6 inputs total). The ICA result showed 33 components, but when I ran dual regression, I got outputs like this:
>> dr_stage2_subject00005_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00005
>> dr_stage2_subject00004_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00004
>> dr_stage2_subject00003_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00003
>> dr_stage2_subject00002_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00002
>> dr_stage2_subject00001_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00001
>> dr_stage2_subject00000_Z
>> dr_stage2_subject00000
>>
>> This does not look like the dual regression outputs I've seen before. Does anyone know what might have caused this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>
> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
|