Hi Mogg,
>>The core issue for me is the criminality & child abuse,<<
Dare I call it "sex with those of an inappropriate age"? as they weren't
exactly children were they? Weren't they 15 and 16? I always think of people
12 and under as "children" - however that doesn't mean that legal terms will
agree with me (in Australia you're a "youth" until 25, but the word "youth"
seems much younger than that).
I have just noticed that over the years some occultists have gotten in awful
trouble and been called "child molesters" for having sex with what are
essentially teenagers. Yes, some teenagers are more mature than others. I'd
imagine that I'd have found it very weird to have had sex with someone who
was even over 20 when I was a teenager, but some don't.
Yes, it does seem manipulative for a much older person to have sex with a
teenager - some/manytimes. I've already been lectured on another list in
regards to Gavin and Yvonne Frost and the "let adult members of the coven
break the virgins in" philosophy. Someone on another list, in regards to the
Frosts, told me that in the 60s it was considered ideal for "older wiser"
adults to give virgins their first taste of sex.
So... all I'm saying is that it might be a bit more complicated in regards
to the teenagers in this case, but then again it might not.
~Caroline.
-----Original Message-----
From: Society for The Academic Study of Magic
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of mandrake
Sent: Sunday, 6 February 2011 9:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] Book of the Law in News 4 wrong reason
Caroline
The core issue for me is the criminality & child abuse,
the other contextual stuff we maybe all tend to think of as less important,
perhaps underestimating the role external things play in influencing
behaviour?
There may well be some quite antisocial beliefs in Liber Al, Liber Oz
and other Thelemic writing -
I suspect most religious/inspired texts have them - so for example the
Bhagavad Gita appears to advocate
total war but it was the non violent Gandhi's favourite text.
Difference is that Bhagavad Gita is sanctified by time -
so the glosses and interpretations now are as well known as the literal
text.
Even so the moral messages of Liber Al ought to make sense to modern
society -
and maybe they don't. If anything Thelemites often talk of being amoral -
or of the triumph of the will?
We are maybe stuck with a scripture that just isn't subtle enough for
the modern world?
"Love and do what you will"
Mogg Morgan
On 05/02/2011 22:42, Caroline Tully wrote:
> Although it could all be true(ish). It's not the first time nutters have
> gone even nuttier with the help of a religious text.
>
> And that brings up the question, to me anyway: How do we interpret The
Book
> of the Law? It's tricksy and poetic, people think they know what it means,
> but do they? Does it mean anything at all?
>
> ~Caroline.
>
|