On 8 February 2011 21:22, D E <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> : ) and i misread it as Otis and ATHENA
>
> as a great fan of the Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram with *Charlies
> Angels* replacing the 'traditional' forms at the quarters (it also evokes
> Fox Mulder, Leslie Nielsen, Colombo and Sherlock Holmes), I am not in the
> 'finding it flippant' school
I've found the chocolate version to be an interesting exercise.
> at the risk of igniting a different and difficult thread,, not read all of
> these here today, has any mention been made of the chaos school of thought,
> that beleif in any particualr deity is fine, for the purposes of ritual, but
> after that, not necessailry?
Given the difficulties in communicating relatively simple concepts, I
thought it best not to introduce the idea that belief in magic and/or
Deity may be a temporary decision at the will of a practitioner.
> Let alone the use of *made up deities which didn't exist ten minutes
> before*
Is this your spoon?
Jymn
|