Ditto. YES, still generally prefer CNS v1.3 to REFMAC, especially due to
composite and simulated-annealing maps.
Different set of flagged reflections, so it might very well be different.
Also, the low-resolution solvent scaling is different between the two
refinements.
Bernie Santarsiero
On Wed, February 16, 2011 7:53 am, Boaz Shaanan wrote:
> Yes X 2
>
> Boaz
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: REX PALMER <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 15:32
> Subject: [ccp4bb] CNS and protein structure refinement
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>> Does anyone still use CNS ?
>> Do we expect Rfree from CNS for example to be different from the
>> value given by Refmac at the end of the refinement?
>>
>> Rex Palmer
>>
>> Birkbeck College
>
> Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
> Dept. of Life Sciences
> Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
> Beer-Sheva 84105
> Israel
> Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
> Skype: boaz.shaanan
>
|