On the SL list, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> is asking for numbers of
machines running SL. If you can reply to him (not me) with numbers, I'm
sure he'd appreciate it.
Chris
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello,
> We are trying to find out a rough number of machines that were running
> Scientific Linux or a derivative of it, such as SLF or SLC during 2010.
>
> If your lab or university and your machines are pointing to your own
> mirror, or a regional mirror, please let us know how many machines you
> have running Scientific Linux or a derivative of Scientific Linux.
>
> You don't have to be exact, but if you would separate the numbers out by
> major releases that would be great.
> Something like
> SL3 - 20
> SL4 - 540
> SL5 - 50
> SLC3 - 5
> SLC4 - 1000
> SLC5 - 1150
>
> Or if you have a webpage, such as
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/about/stats/
> http://fermilinux.fnal.gov/documentation/metrics/2010/major/
> that would be even better.
>
> We're in a bit of a hurry, so if you could get these numbers to me by
> the end of the week (15 January 2011) that would be great.
>
> Thank You
> Troy Dawson
|