On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Matthijs H.D. van der Wiel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Peter W. Draper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> sorry, seems I confused what you get from the fitting of a composite
>> model with what you get from the single line fitting. In fact you will
>> not currently get any error estimates for the parameters from a
>> composite fit under any circumstances.
>>
>> Since the change is relatively trivial I've changed SPLAT so that it
>> now also reports errors for the composite fits as well.
>
> Thanks for updating SPLAT to tackle this. I know it has been able to
> provide uncertainties on the fitted parameters for single-component-fits
> for some time now.
>
>>
>> Tim, I've submitted these are they accepted for the new release?
>>
>
> So do I understand correctly from this that a new Starlink release is
> coming up soon? If yes: how soon? If not, then is there a simple
> 'patch' I could incorporate in the January 2010 Starlink version (on
> Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8)?
> [The starlink homepage at http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/ seems to be
> giving old information about the Lehuakona release from Nov 2008...]
Hi Matthijs,
mostly questions for Tim, but from the SPLAT patch front the answer is no
a patch isn't possible, so you will need to get an update for Mac from Tim
(he keeps a development version), or wait for the next release which is
underway.
Cheers,
Peter.
|