It does work well. That is great!
Many Thanks!
On 1/28/11, Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Hui,
> (sorry for non-ccp4 recipe)
> IF I understand correctly what you want to do, then I guess you can achieve
> this using Map Superposition:
>
> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/superpose_maps.htm
>
> and/or Structure Comparison tools in PHENIX:
>
> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/structure_comparison.htm
>
> where you can superpose many models and corresponding maps, and see all them
> in one display, along with highlighted differences.
>
> Nat Echols, the author of both tools, is someone to ask should you have any
> questions.
>
> Pavel.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, RONG hui Rong
> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have the problem as follows, but I can not find the corresponding
>> solution. Can somebody give me some suggestions?
>> Many Thanks,
>> Hui Rong
>>
>> *****************************************************************************************
>> [PyMOL] aligning electron density maps
>>
>>
>> Eksterowicz, John
>> Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:03:43 -0800
>>
>> I have a pdb and xplor file which contain two units of the same
>> protein/inhibitor complex. What I am trying to do is align the two
>> proteins to each other so I can compare the subunits. I can accomplish
>> this by reading in the pdb file twice and aligning the b unit from the
>> second pdb file to the a unit of the first pdb file. I then split
>> everything into objects then delete what i don't want. In the end I
>> have subunits a and b aligned to each other.
>>
>> I would like to be able to do the same thing for the electron denisty
>> map. Is there a way to align maps?
>>
>> If I read in a protein and a map, then align the protein to another
>> protein, the protein moves, but the map remains in it's original
>> location. Can the map coordinates be transformed somehow?
>>
>> Is it possible to create some association with the protein and the map
>> such that when the protein is aligned, the map will follow?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>> *****************************************************************************************
>>
>> On 1/28/11, RONG hui Rong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>
>
|