Bad data = processing with XDS
Jürgen
......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab: +1-410-614-4894
Fax: +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
On Jan 28, 2011, at 6:46, José Trincão <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have been trying to squeeze the most out of a bad data set (P1, anisotropic, crystals not reproducible). I had very incomplete data due to high mosaicity and lots of overlaps. The completeness was about 80% overall to ~3A. Yesterday I noticed that I could process the data much better fixing the mosaicity to 0.5 in imosflm. I got about 95% complete up to 2.5A but with a multiplicity of 1.7. I tried to integrate the same data fixing the mosaicity at different values ranging from 0.2 to 0.6 and saw the trend in completeness, Rmerge and multiplicity.
> Now, is there any reason why I should not just merge all these together and feed them to scala in order to increase multiplicity?
> Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks for any comments!
>
> Jose
>
>
> José Trincão, PhD CQFB@FCT-UNL
> 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
>
> "It's very hard to make predictions... especially about the future" - Niels Bohr
|