Holy Moley,
On 2 Dec 2010, at 16:33, Matt Doidge wrote:
> rpm -qa | grep lsf
> #glite-apel-lsf-2.0.10-1
> lsf-7.0.6-1
> lsf-lmgrd-7.0.6-1
> glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-lsf-2.0.7-1
is there also an lcg-info-dynamic-scheduler installed????? Will you do an rpm -qa on the glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-lsf package? I really hate this, finding out I am trying to debug either a hacked version of my plugin, or else a horribly named but otherwise valid package.
Plugins for the dynamic-scheduler should be called something like
lrmsinfo-lsf
because they are not making any scheduling predictions themselves, they are just dumping INFO about the LRMS state for LSF ...
There should *never* be a glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-lsf (or -anything-else) except for -generic. If it only provides the lrmsinfo, it should be named as above. If it really is computing scheduling predictions, it should be uninstalled.
This is by design, to avoid biases between LRMS flavors, the algorithm is completely statistics based and hence exactly the same for all LRMS flavors.
JT
ps: Matt : this rant is not for you, sorry.
|