Dear Brian,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Brian Smith wrote:
...
> I guess the curent way the data model views min & max aliased frequencies
> makes sense (on a per spectrum basis) - the real aliasing ranges are set by
> the way the spectrum is acquired rather than processed. When chopping bits
> out of the acquisition dim of a spectrum we often lie to analysis about what
> the true "original" number of points and sweep width were.
I recommend telling the truth. If you lie tiling gets mixed up. Analysis
can handle the truth.
> I guess what I'm asking for really is an extra "range(s) within which
> contours are drawn" setting. This would a perhaps also allow one to mask out
> duff bits (like solvent stripes) that are often problematic in terms of
> contouring speed.
I just raised that possibility with Tim. This might fall foul of the 'no
extra features for the time being' decision, but we'll let you know what
we decide.
Rasmus
|