There has been a domain issue involving the Review that is currently being fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience. Continuing the Review in print was not fiscally sustainable. We are hoping to offer an annual print option in the future.
best,
Sheila Cavanagh
Editor, Spenser Review
________________________________________
From: Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce Danner [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Where (o where) is the Spenser Review?
The Spenser Review seems to be offline. Is it me, or can anyone else bring it up?
I have to say (apropos of recent posts) that I miss the physical presence of SR, and have not heard any options of getting an annual volume via print. As others have noted, I don't read the notices, abstracts, and reviews online with the same attention to detail as I did in the old print copies, mainly because the physical copies carried a real presence on the shelf/desk, and could be picked up and reread many times. A real loss, it seems to me, an example of technology making us less connected substantively to each other's work. To say nothing of only having $100 hardback copies of Spenser Studies available (there, I said it). Could not AMS be prevailed upon to issue softcover versions of the 2010 volume in 2011 or '12? It would be different if Spenser Studies were available online, but until (or if) it (ever) is, its desired market is prohibitively priced out, a scholarly loss to us and a modest financial opportunity to AMS wasted, it would seem to me.
What gives?
Bruce Danner
-----Original Message-----
>From: "Cavanagh, Sheila T" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Oct 27, 2010 8:18 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Spenser Review
>
>Greetings. The new issue of Spenser Review is now available on line. Hope to see many of you at MLA.
>
>best,
>
>Sheila Cavanagh
>Editor, Spenser Review
>
>This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
>the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
>or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
>prohibited.
>
>If you have received this message in error, please contact
>the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
>original message (including attachments).
|