Dear All,
I solved the mystery it was simply one subject whose first level analyses was not correct. When ran correctly in both versions of spm8 the results are identical, So all in all good news.
KQ
Karina
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Watson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:38 PM
To: Quevedo, Karina
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SPM] spm5 to spm8 different results
Did you change the threshold (e.g. switch from uncorrected to FWE)?
Quevedo, Karina wrote:
>
> Hi, I wonder if somebody has encountered this. I pre-processed, ran
> first level analyses and second level analyses in spm5, then when I
> loaded the SPM.mat resulting from spm5 onto smp8 I got the same areas
> of activation but the size of the clusters was huge compared with the
> ones yielded by spm5.
>
> Any ideas of why this is happening and has anybody seen these before.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Karina
>
>
>
> Karina Quevedo, Ph.D.
>
> Clinical and Translational Affective Neuroscience Program
>
>
>
>
>
|