Did you change the threshold (e.g. switch from uncorrected to FWE)?
Quevedo, Karina wrote:
>
> Hi, I wonder if somebody has encountered this. I pre-processed, ran
> first level analyses and second level analyses in spm5, then when I
> loaded the SPM.mat resulting from spm5 onto smp8 I got the same areas
> of activation but the size of the clusters was huge compared with the
> ones yielded by spm5.
>
> Any ideas of why this is happening and has anybody seen these before.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Karina
>
>
>
> Karina Quevedo, Ph.D.
>
> Clinical and Translational Affective Neuroscience Program
>
>
>
>
>
|