JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  November 2010

MCG November 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Costs of Sales

From:

Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:11:52 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

In my first week at NMSI I put a couple of items from our shop and publications unit on our homepage.

Within an hour, I'd had three phone calls from various staff - curators, education people, others - complaining about "overt commercialisation".

I didn't understand it in 2000, and I don't understand it now, a decade later.

As far as I'm concerned, users want both "cultural experiences" and "shopping experiences". 

Our job is to make these two experiences work together. But to do that, we need to understand them better. 

We're really good at the former, and for the most part I think we're pretty bad at the latter. 

Surely we should be redressing the balance? 



Mike Ellis
Research & Innovation Group
eduserv
t: 01225 470522
m: 07017 031 522
twitter: @m1ke_ellis

www.eduserv.org.uk
________________________________________
From: Museums Computer Group [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nick Poole [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Costs of Sales

Hi Tehmina,

You make a good and valid point re: costings but I'm worried about your latter comment.

I know we all hate bankers and that they are the root cause of all our woes etc, but it's wrong simply to dismiss the perspective.

The guy *is* an international financier, specifically head of an international investment bank, and memory institution is a perfectly common formulation in Europe, where it is an attempt to reconcile museums with 'things that are a bit like museums'.

I worry when our sector sounds self-serving, because our primary purpose is to meet the needs of everyday, normal human beings. Bankers, too, have a prime function of catering to the needs and behaviours of normal people (because that's how you generate profits), and if someone with considerable experience of what sells and what doesn't sell finds our offer baffling, then we should jolly well listen.

This whole public/private sector dichotomy is an artifice, and as we confront a period in which we can no longger rely on the Government to collect admission fees direct from taxpayers for us, we are going to have to change the rhetoric around commercialisation.

I'm sorry if it sounds like I am singling you out, but this is one of a number of dismissive comments I have received via the backchannel and it concerns me that people are letting prejudice get in the way of engaging with the very serious issue of the lack of clarity as to our core purpose among large parts of the population.

I'd welcome a really punchy debate on this one, because it's a discussion that we need to have!

All best,

Nick
Nick Poole, Chief Executive, Collections Trust

-----Original Message-----
From:         Tehmina Goskar <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:25:35
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:     Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Costs of Sales

This and the previous thread on open data have been excellent reading.
I would be quite interested in knowing what proportion of digitisation
(on a per item basis) is achieved through funds external to the
collecting organisations, and what proportion is funded as part of
core activities. How far does the former outweigh the latter? This is
where full economic costing will skew results when deciding how much
sales actually cost.

Anyone who calls themselves an 'international financier' and deigns to
comment on the activities of 'memory institutions' ought to have
his/her views treated accordingly.

Tehmina

On 30 November 2010 13:45, Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I have been following this discussion with considerable interest, particularly since it speaks to the hope I expressed at last Friday's UK Museums on the Web that Digital activity in the sector would at last start to make a real-terms cash contribution into museums.
>
>
>
> The Collections Trust has been working for the past few weeks on a research project to model the Costs of Digitisation for the European Commission. We have had to take an approach based on full economic costing, which includes a reasonable apportionment of overheads and ancillary costs, plus the per-item scanning cost, plus the long-term/lifetime cost of ownership, stewardship and preservation. When you take all of these things into account, the unit cost (depending on the material and a wide range of other variables can range from as little as £25 up to hundreds if not thousands of pounds.
>
>
>
> If you were calculating the price of a digital image in a commercial context, you would have to apportion a reasonable allocation of these 'production costs' to each transaction, on the basis of a reasonable expectation of the number of times an item is likely to be used, plus a percentage to act as a margin to enable you to do further Digitisation. I very much doubt that any of the examples we have discussed in this thread have applied full economic costing to the transactions in this way, or have priced on the basis of recovering 100% of their costs plus a margin.
>
>
>
> The user's expectations of a reasonable license fee to use an image just doesn't match the real costs of delivering that asset. Hence image sales in the vast majority of museums are likely to be being subsidised heavily by the taxpayer. The higher the throughput of transactions, the lower the unit cost can be (because the costs are spread over a larger number of uses), which is why the market is tending towards a smaller number of higher-volume providers.
>
>
>
> I am currently in a session at the European Commission where an international financier is giving a banker's perspective on Digitisation in 'memory institutions', and I think his comments are worth sharing:
>
>
>
> ·         Investment banks and commercial investors would be sceptical of investing in Digitisation of cultural heritage as a commercial proposition for the following reasons:
>
>
>
> ·         The legal status of the collections is not clear, and hence it is not clear that Digitisation produces an economic asset
>
> ·         Memory institutions are not technical experts and do not always adopt appropriate technical strategies to maximise revenue
>
> ·         It is not clear how the material will be used, if at all, and to what purpose
>
> ·         Memory institutions feel compelled to digitise, but it is not clear that there is demand for these assets
>
> ·         It is not clear what the revenue potential of digital cultural assets might be
>
> ·         Technology depreciates very rapidly
>
> ·         Digitisation tends to span multiple elective periods, and so is at risk of changes in Government priority
>
>
>
> ·         In short, there is not a business model for Digitisation in memory institutions, which means that investors would regard this as an unacceptable investment risk
>
>
>
> Thought you'd enjoy that!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nick Poole
>
> Chief Executive
>
> Collections Trust
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> Tel: 0207 022 1889
>
> OpenCulture 2011
> UK and international Collections Management Trade Fair and Conference
> Manchester, 7th & 8th June 2011.
> Register online at http://www.openculture2011.org.uk <http://www.openculture2011.org.uk>
>
>
>
> http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk
>
> http://www.collectionslink.org.uk
>
> http://openculture.collectionstrustblogs.org.uk
>
>
>
> Follow us on Twitter: @collectiontrust <http://www.twitter.com/collectiontrust>
>
> Follow me on Twitter: @nickpoole1
>
> Contact me on Skype: nickpoole3
>
> Connect via LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=5289899&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro
>
>
>
> Company Registration No: 1300565
>
> Registered Charity No: 273984
>
> Registered Office: Collections Trust c/o CAN Mezzanine, Downstream Building, No1 London Bridge, London SE1 9BG
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************
> For mcg information visit the mcg website at
> http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> To manage your subscription to this email list visit
> http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>



--
Dr Tehmina Goskar, MA AMA
[log in to unmask]

http://tehmina.goskar.com/

Research Officer: ESRC History, Heritage, and Urban Regeneration: The
Global and Local Worlds of Welsh Copper
History & Classics
University of Swansea

****************************************************************
For mcg information visit the mcg website at
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
To manage your subscription to this email list visit
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

****************************************************************
For mcg information visit the mcg website at
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
To manage your subscription to this email list visit
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

****************************************************************
For mcg information visit the mcg website at
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
To manage your subscription to this email list visit
http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager