JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  November 2010

CCP4BB November 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Crystal structures of phosphorylated proteins

From:

Michael Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michael Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:24:11 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (81 lines)

Hi Sally,

Crystallization of proteins with multiple phosphorylation sites is often a difficult problem. Like you said it is often an issue of inhomogeneity. Several suggestions that may be helpful:

First, I would use a bit of your protein sample for Mass Spec analysis. It is possible (though maybe not likely if your protein has multiple sites) that your sample is homogenous and you don't even have to worry. 

Next, I would think about what you are trying to learn about this protein from the crystal structure. If you are interested in how the structure is effected by phosphorylation, there are several things you can do. To obtain a structure of the fully dephosphorylated protein you can use a nonspecific phosphatase before crystallization to remove all the phosphates. Alternatively you can mutate the phosphorylation sites. Mutating Ser to Ala, Thr to Val, and Tyr to Phe will probably not effect your protein's native structure very much (if at all), no matter how many substitutions you have to make. You should, however, determine the phosphorylation sites beforehand so you are not unnecessarily mutating S,T, and Y residues that aren't ever going to be phosphorylated. To learn how phosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues influences the structure, it is often useful to mutate the phosphorylation site to Glu, because it's size, shape, and charge properties are not very different from phosphoserine or phosphothreonine. This strategy is not perfect, but it can work well, especially since it directly addresses the problem of inhomogeneity.

A final suggestion is to just try and crystallize your protein with inhomogeneous phosphorylation. Depending on how inhomogeneous your sample is at each site, you will likely see phosphates that have only partial occupancies (and you might not ever see phosphates at sites that are weakly phosphorylated), but it still might be sufficient to gain the information you are interested in. Again, if you plan to do this, mass spec may help you understand your data. If you can mass spec digested protein you may be able to figure out which phosphorylation sites have high and low occupancy (I'm not a mass spec expert though), and you could compare this data with what you observe in your crystal structure.

Another quick thing to mention is to be weary of your expression system. If you express your protein in an exogenous expression system, the phosphorylation state you observe may be different (dramatically different in some cases) from what occurs in the native context, which is what you're interested in. Again, mass spec could help you here.

Hope this helps,

Mike Thompson





----- Original Message -----
From: "Sally Pham Thanh Van" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 11:03:49 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Crystal structures of phosphorylated proteins

To make it clearer, I'm looking for successful examples of
crystallization of phosphorylated proteins, especially ones containing
multiple phosphorylation sites, and would like to access
crystallizability of these protein types. I want to produce and
crystallize protein at its phosphorylation state but I learned
phosphorylation may cause inhomogeneity problem and interfere with
crystallization. It's not a good option to replace these sites anyway
because there are many and may affect native structure of the protein.

Any input would be appreciated,
Sally.







On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Atlanta Cook <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Perhaps you might pose a more directed question... Do you want to produce
> phosphorylated protein? Are you having trouble crystallising a protein that
> is phosphorylated?
>
>
> Atlanta
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Nov 2010, at 11:09, Sally Pham Thanh Van wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Could you please tell me any information regarding to crystal
>> structures of phosphorylated proteins? Your input would be
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sally.
>
>

-- 
Michael C. Thompson

Graduate Student

Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Division

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry

University of California, Los Angeles

[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager