JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  October 2010

OCC-HEALTH October 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Equality Act & Morbidly obese staff

From:

Catherine Mackay <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:11:52 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (343 lines)

Hello Anne

I don't know that and you are perfectly correct - it could be and you are
clearly more expert on this particular area! The purpose of the post was
the actual case law.

Best regards

Catherine
> Interesting, the renal condition from which he was suffering may have been
> a
> significant factor. The associated weight gain being a health condition
> rather than purely a life-style choice.
>
> Anne
>
>
> On 11/10/10 22:46, "Catherine Mackay" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Catherine/Sharon
>>
>> Royal Mail forced to reinstate 25-stone postman
>> Dan Thomas 25 January 2005 11:00
>>
>> An employment tribunal has ordered the Royal Mail to reinstate a postman
>> and pay him compensation of 24,000 for unfair dismissal.
>> A Scottish postman dismissed on health grounds after his weight
>> ballooned
>> to 25 stones has won his job back and been awarded more than £24,000
>> compensation by an employment tribunal.
>>
>> Ronald Agnew, from Ayr, was taken off delivery duties, but ended up
>> losing
>> his job on health grounds when his managers at Royal Mail claimed they
>> could not find another job for him, according to a report in the
>> Scottish
>> Herald newspaper.
>>
>> Agnew claimed he was treated unfairly, as other workers had been given
>> the
>> chance to undertake lighter duties to avoid dismissal.
>>
>> He said he could have carried out a driving job, but management argued
>> his
>> bulk made it difficult for him to fit into a van. Agnew in turn argued
>> he
>> could still drive his Ford Escort car with no difficulty.
>>
>> He took his case to a Glasgow tribunal after his dismissal through
>> retirement on health grounds after 18 years of service. Now the tribunal
>> has ruled he should get back his job as a postman and be paid £24,278 in
>> compensation.
>>
>> The tribunal ruled that the decision to dismiss Agnew, who suffered from
>> kidney problems and fluid retention, was unreasonable and unfair. The
>> tribunal chairman, Frances Eccles, said: "The claimant was unwell and in
>> need of support."
>>
>> He added that Royal Mail was a large employer and attempts to find Agnew
>> alternative duties to accommodate his medical condition had been
>> inadequate.
>>
>> Whilst this case is rather old now, I think that reasonableness is key
>> bearing in mind that obesity is not a medical condition rather
>> life-style
>> which can result in medical conditions at this point in time.
>>
>> Those with more knowledge of Bariatric Medicine will be the experts on
>> this subject.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Catherine Mackay
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Just found this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A fireman facing the sack because he was deemed 'too fat' for
>>> operational
>>> duties has been dismissed after failing to shed enough weight.
>>>
>>> Grampian firefighter Kevin Ogilvie was given just three months to beat
>>> the
>>> bulge and told to shift the lard or ship out by fire chiefs.
>>>
>>> But Mr Ogilvie was unable to get fit enough in the conditional 12-week
>>> period resulting in his dismissal on Monday.
>>>
>>> The 47-year-old was initially sacked in March 2008 after 22 years of
>>> service with Grampian Fire and Rescue.
>>>
>>> Safety fears were sparked when Mr Ogilvie's weight ballooned over the
>>> 20
>>> stone mark, with management claiming he had become a safety risk,
>>> endangering his colleagues and himself.
>>>
>>> But furious firefighters threatened to strike in a pact of solidarity
>>> on
>>> behalf of Mr Ogilvie, who was given the three-month reprieve - which
>>> was
>>> branded 'a stay of execution' by union leaders.
>>>
>>> The Fire Brigades Union confirmed that Mr Ogilvie was dismissed on
>>> Monday
>>> after failing to meet the legally binding conditions set out by
>>> Grampian
>>> Fire and Rescue principal management, which included a condition of
>>> fitness.
>>>
>>> At the time, Grampian Fire and Rescue Service said it had a clear
>>> fitness
>>> policy and had reached its decision after offering him support.
>>>
>>> But FBU brigade secretary for the Grampian Region, Alan Paterson, said
>>> the
>>> targets set for Mr Ogilvie were 'totally unrealistic'.
>>>
>>> He said: 'It came as no surprise to us, we've always stated that the
>>> bar
>>> was set too high, we always feared that it was designed for him to fail
>>> -
>>> it was a stay of execution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> More...
>>>
>>> Firefighters 'will strike' after their 20-stone colleague is sacked for
>>> being 'too fat'
>>>
>>>
>>> 'Prof Broom, a nutrition expert, said Kevin would get fit if he
>>> followed
>>> their programme over nine to 12 months, not two or three months.
>>>
>>> 'But there was a legal compromise and he was under threat to sign it or
>>> his contract would be terminated on those grounds, so he had no
>>> alternative but to sign.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Happier days: During 22 years of fire service, Kevin Ogilvie's weight
>>> ballooned to more than 20-stone
>>> 'Looking at Kevin at the time, during the first six weeks you could see
>>> he
>>> was making progress.
>>>
>>> 'He has continued to lose weight, but not at the rate set, that's what
>>> it
>>> comes down to.
>>>
>>> 'It's really disappointing because everyone can see he is trying and
>>> losing weight as well.'
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr Paterson said an emergency meeting had been arranged for after the
>>> Grampian Fire Services Joint Board's meeting tomorrow.
>>>
>>> He refused to reveal the specifics targets set out by principal
>>> management, but said Mr Ogilvie had been given a strict regime to
>>> follow.
>>>
>>> He added: 'It was specific, he was set monthly targets to achieve
>>> aerobic
>>> capacity and weight loss.
>>>
>>> 'He was doing that, but not at the rate they had set, which we pointed
>>> out
>>> to them in the first place was unrealistic after seeking expert advice.
>>> It's very disappointing.'
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr Paterson said Mr Ogilvie couldn't be considered for a
>>> non-operational
>>> role in the fire service because he didn't hold a rank.
>>>
>>> Mr Ogilvie, who lives in Aberdeen, declined to comment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Read more:
>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1117763/Fireman-sacked-fat-failing-mo
>>> nth-test-lose-weight.html#ixzz124Z1MKYe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: RE: [OCC-HEALTH] Equality Act & Morbidly obese staff
>>> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:49 +0100
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CBT? Might be useful. Medical reasons for weight eg thyroid problems?
>>>
>>> I think this is a difficult area - if he cant do what is required of
>>> him
>>> AND he is responsible for vulnerable people then I think redeployment
>>> may
>>> be the only answer, but how long would the company be able to sustain
>>> this? I think people like police/fire and rescue services have to deal
>>> with fairly hefty individuals who cannnot fulfil fitness standards for
>>> their job - seem to remember a case a while ago of a firefighter who
>>> was
>>> sacked and took his employer to ET for unfair dismissal and I think he
>>> may
>>> have won, despite being given every opportunity and time to bring his
>>> weight, and therefore capabilities into line
>>>
>>> Legislation may not apply specifically for the weight issue  but
>>> secondary
>>> health issues may well be relevant eg blood pressure/cardiac
>>> problems/respiratory issues/MSD`s  (like it would for people with
>>> substance abuse issues). Interestingly I know of a similar case but in
>>> reverse - care worker with anorexia and BMI of 14.3. This issue hinged
>>> around whether she was safe - she wasnt as she worked in a sleepover
>>> capacity and a lone worker helping the clients if they got into
>>> difficulties in the night. She was redeployed onto days for better peer
>>> and management support, liaison with GP, went into a residential
>>> treatment
>>> facility for 4 months , got paid sick pay while in. Now back at work as
>>> her weight has apparently stabilised
>>>
>>>
>>> Good luck!
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:12 +0100
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] Equality Act & Morbidly obese staff
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Thoughts please ­ I have a support worker (working with vulnerable
>>> clients
>>> with learning and some physical disabilities) who is probably around 35
>>> stone (and apparently gaining) who is really struggling to fulfill his
>>> job
>>> role, breathless going up stairs and bending, canıt fit behind steering
>>> wheel in clients car (and we canıt change it) etc,etc. We have
>>> completed a
>>> functional risk assessment but was wondering if anyone has any
>>> experience
>>> or suggestions around how we could manage this and support him.
>>> Obviously
>>> capability is an option but the company has asked how else we can
>>> support
>>> him.
>>>
>>> Obviously Iıll do the GP, dietician, EAP bit but I am more specifically
>>> interested in whether you would support with a clear behavioural
>>> contact
>>> as we would for someone with another addictive type behaviour problem
>>> e.g. alcohol or drugs.
>>>
>>> Anyone aware of any case law for obesity and the old DDA ­ my HR team
>>> couldnıt find any........
>>>
>>> Oh wise ones ­ all suggestions gratefully received!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Cath
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ******************************** Please remove this footer before
>>> replying. OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
>>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>>
>>> ********************************
>>> Please remove this footer before replying.
>>>
>>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
>>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>>
>>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>>
>>
>>
>> Catherine Mackay
>> Work & Health Consultant
>> MSc(Work Psychol.)Grad.IOSH
>> c.  +44(0)7956439163
>> l:  +44(0)1314454448
>> e:  [log in to unmask]
>> w:  cmkworkandhealth.com(under reconstruction)
>> http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/publications/?entryid5=67533
>>
>> ********************************
>> Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>
>
> ********************************
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>


Catherine Mackay
Work & Health Consultant
MSc(Work Psychol.)Grad.IOSH
c.  +44(0)7956439163
l:  +44(0)1314454448
e:  [log in to unmask]
w:  cmkworkandhealth.com(under reconstruction)
http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/publications/?entryid5=67533

********************************
Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager