I'm awaiting analysis against all the lines in the accounts to see where the extra cost came from but that seems the most likely source
Dr Roger Gardiner
On 10 Oct 2010, at 19:16, Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Did you find any relationship between cost of New Outpatients and
> unscheduled admissions?
> i.e. is there any suggestion that patients who should have been referred but
> haven't been, end up as emergency admissions instead?
>
> Mary Hawking
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roger Gardiner
> Sent: 10 October 2010 18:25
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Analysis of referrals
>
> The graph was cost of New Out-Patient attendances as % of total spend
> against average spend per registered patient (not just those who had been
> referred)
>
> And the higher the % spend the lower the average cost of healthcare.
>
> Dr Roger Gardiner
>
>
> On 10 Oct 2010, at 16:58, "Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY)"
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Sounds intriguing...
>>
>> BUT I could produce a simple graph too, but what criteria did you use for
> referrals and "spend"
>>
>> BW Tim
>>
>> On 10 Oct 2010, at 12:58, Roger Gardiner wrote:
>>
>>> I did a simple graph for my PBC which showed that the more you refer the
> LESS you spend/registered patient.
>>>
>>> Not quite the result the PCT expected - the board meeting was silent for
> 30 seconds after I distributed the graph.
>>>
>>> They are now checking the effect across the PCT but if confirmed the lack
> of effect of referral management centres etc. is explained.
>>>
>>> I'm waiting for further analysis to see if the extra costs came through
> prescribing/A+E/more complex interventions when they were referred or
> something else.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Sent: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 23:35
>>> Subject: Analysis of referrals
>>>
>>> Does anyone have either first hand audit data of the breakdown of
>>> referrals by specialty and/or reason or know of any UK research data
>>> about this?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> ****************************************************************************
> ****************************************
>>
>> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> intended recipient please inform the
>> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
>> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or
> take any action in reliance on its contents:
>> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>>
>> Thank you for your co-operation.
>>
>> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS
> staff in England and Scotland
>> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive
> information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
>> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be
> accessed anywhere
>> For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit
> www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
>>
>>
> ****************************************************************************
> ****************************************
|