JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


FSL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

FSL  October 2010

FSL October 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

problems with Pfile RAS coords in FSLview XYZ Scanner Anatomical coords

From:

Alex Ramos <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:21:25 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (29 lines)

Hello,

MR spectroscopy was taken with a depth of 7 slices along the SI axis using a GE scanner. The region of interest from which the MRS was taken is manipulated by hand using a mouse with GE software. It appears that LPS (right-handed) coordinate system or the RAS (right-handed) coordinate system cannot be specified when placing the MRS region on the scan. Also, the MRS voxel size is different from the T1 voxel size obtained during the scan. 

After the scan, Dicom images were converted to Nifti format with dcm2nii. The Pfile from the scanner prints the center slice number in both Z mm (from XYZ) as 66 and S (from RAS) as 48.3. I enter 0 mm for both the X and Y axes and 0 for the Scanner Anatomical coordinates for both R and A axes.  When entering both Scanner Anatomical (0,0,48.3) and XYZ (0,0,66) coordinates into FSLview the printed center slice number in the Pfile is correct for the Scanner Anatomical coordinate and one slice too superior for the XYZ coordinate. We assume that this is due to FSLview including 0 as the first slice? 

We verify the correct location of the center slice by looking at a jpg screen shot of the GE monitor when the MRS was done. The center slice number on the screen shot corresponds to the Pfile XYZ coordinate (0,0,66); however, this number, 66, is given in the Pfile as the slice where the MRS was prescribed. No specific coordinates are shown in the jpg of the scanner screen shot. We are certain that the correlations between the Pfile, the screen shot, and the Nifti images we have allow us to select the correct Nifti image to view in FSLview. 

This screen shot gives a 2D graphic of the center and borders of the MRS region of interest in sag, cor, and axial views, so the position of the MRS roi is roughly known. The Pfile reports the coordinates of the MRS roi in an RAS coordinate system. It seems that the scanner interprets the MRS box made with a mouse using an RAS system. I assume that transformation matrices are used to generate the RAS coordinates for the MRS roi, but I can't seem to find them. 

The RX xyz csi volume dimensions from the Pfile appear to correlate to the mm volume of the MRS roi, which was made standard across subjects, but the reported x volume should be the y volume (and the y volume should be the x volume) . When entering the RX xyz csi volume center into FSLview, the center is not in the correct position (even if we swap the x and y values). I don't know if the RX xyz csi values correspond to the center of the MRS roi, the center of the MRS's center voxel, or the center voxel of the T1 scan. I assume it's MRS related because the volume reported correlates to the MRS roi.

The Pfile also reports the (R,A,S) Center coord of plane image. When these coordinates are entered into the Scanner Anatomical options in FSLview, the center is correct but it is one slice too inferior. This is confusing because when entering (0,0,48.3) the correct slice is viewed along the SI axis (axial plane). 

The Pfile gives the coordinates of the top left, top right and bottom right handed corners. Do these values correlate to the MRS center voxel or the MRS roi or the center voxel of the T1 scan? When I enter them into the Scanner Anatomical spaces in FSLview the R, A, and S coordinates are off for all considerations. It seems that when entering the R and A values into Scanner Anatomical values in FSLview they need to be swapped along with a sign change to the R value? But this is uncertain. It is something we have just intuited at best.  I assume that transformation matrices converting the MRS roi coordinates to the LPS Dicom format to the RAS Nifti format are not printed in the Pfile, Dicom header, or Nifti header. 

I have viewed the sform matrix and the offsets using fslhd -x, calculated the dicom matrix by using cross products of the two-column two-row array with correct sign changes, and the inverses of both of these.

The MRS roi cannot be exported after making it with the GE scanner software.

Our goal is to reproduce the MRS roi in FSLview so that coordinates may be used to extract the exact roi using fslroi. Right now we have a rough roi at best using the screen shot.  Metabolite data will then be generated from a proton density roi of the same and location as the MRS roi. The PD roi is flirted to the space where the MRS was prescribed. Resampling is done using a variety of fsl tools.

I read on this forum that FSLview has problems reading "radiological data" because it "prefers" "neurological data." I don't know which of these two formats the data is collected from the GE scanner. I also tried using functions like fslorient and fslswapdim to try to remedy the problem of using the Pfile RAS coordinates to reconstruct the MRS box or the MRS voxel in FSLview. 

Could someone please help? I realize that there are numerous issues raised here and that each requires a fair amount of depth.

Thank you,
Alex

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager