Feel free to use it as you wish.
------
DUFF, Anthony wrote:
> I reckon you could share hypothetical review comments for educational
> purposes.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)
> Sent: Thu 10/28/2010 12:22 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)
>
> Why not double open review? If I have something reasonable to say, I should
> be able to sign it. Particularly if the publicly purported point of review
> is to make the manuscript better. And imagine what wonderful open hostility
> we would enjoy instead of all these hidden grudges! You would never have to
> preemptively condemn a paper on grounds of suspicion that it is from someone
> who might have reviewed you equally loathful earlier. You actually know that
> you are creaming the right bastard!
>
> A more serious question for the editors amongst us: Can I publish review
> comments or are they covered under some confidentiality rule? Some of these
> gems are quite worthy public entertainment.
>
> Best, BR
>
--
Zbyszek Otwinowski
UT Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8816
(214) 645 6385 (phone) (214) 645 6353 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
|