The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  October 2010

DISABILITY-RESEARCH October 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Call for papers

From:

Colin Barnes <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Colin Barnes <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:19:18 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

CALL FOR PAPERS

From disabled writers





Disabled people – a right to live?



All three papers will take a social model approach and will address the issues around the Right to Live agenda for disabled people from birth through to death. We are interested to show how each individual paper relates to the others. The papers should explore the impact on British society;  compare/contrast with the values of other cultures (especially non-Western); how the issues are driven/influenced by the tug between secular and non-secular, cultural beliefs and by financial resources agenda which may be hidden under the guise of 'rights', 'choice', 'control' and 'ethical/moral' considerations



The papers will address one of the following:-



a)	Pressures that families / parents may face, during a pregnancy, to terminate a life due to either impairment of the foetus or the mother’s and/or father’s impairment,

b)	The involuntary mercy killing of disabled people by professionals / paid carers / family members and friends

c)	The ‘Right to Die’ issues, euthanasia, and assisted suicide relating to disabled people. 

 	



SUBMISSION PROCEDURE



Three copies of the abstract for your chosen paper (a abstract of 100 – 150 words) should be submitted to Policy and Research Unit, c/o Gary Timperley, Policy and Research Assistant, Breakthrough UK Ltd, Business Employment Venture Centre, Aked Close, Ardwick, Manchester M12 4AN, on or before Friday 29th October 2010. Further details available on our website www.breakthrough-uk.co.uk 



 

Tender Brief – Description of service required



This document will introduce you to the company, its aims and objectives and give a brief outline of the proposed work.



Title of piece of work: - Disabled people – a right to live?



1.	Breakthrough UK Ltd:  



Breakthrough UK Ltd is a successful independent social enterprise, managed mainly by disabled people. It brings together disabled people, local businesses, and other agencies to plan and deliver projects and services to promote independence. Based in the North West of England, Breakthrough UK provides independent living support, training, employment and business opportunities to disabled people within the social model of disability.  On average 60-70% of Breakthrough’s staff are disabled people, with first hand knowledge and experience of the barriers to independence and employment.  We are proud that Breakthrough was cited in the ‘Improving Life Chances’ report as a good practice example of a social enterprise working in the field of employment and disability.



The Breakthrough Policy Think Tank is a response to what we see as a ‘policy vacuum’ in relation to disability. Its membership brings together a small group of people known to subscribe to the social model, who are known for their analytical approach, and their tendency to “stretch the boundaries” in a variety of areas. 



The Policy Think Tank has two major aims:



•	To influence government, or other strategic bodies, on matters to do with disability, from a ‘social model’ perspective. 

•	To provide briefings on current matters to do with disability for general dissemination.



The Social Model of Disability: traditionally disabled people have been seen as a problem, to be tackled by focusing interventions on the individual. Developed by disabled people themselves, the social model locates the problem with the structures and organisation of society, which take little or no account of what disabled people need to be autonomous and to live independently. We believe that all policy and practice proposals relating to 



disability and disabled people should be rooted in the social model of disability – adopted by the government through the “Improving Life Chances” report of 2005.





2.	Brief description of Proposed Tender



Breakthrough UK Ltd (BUK) wishes to commission a consultant/researcher(s) to research and report on the issues around the whole life agenda for disabled people from birth through to death.  The series of three papers will address the issues relating to; 



d)	Pressures that families / parents may face, during a pregnancy, to terminate a life due to either impairment of the un-born child(foetus) or the mother’s impairment,

e)	The involuntary mercy killing of disabled people by professionals / paid carers / family members and friends 

f)	The ‘Right to Die’ issues, euthanasia, and assisted suicide relating to disabled people. 



All three papers will take a social model approach to the issues; will be aware of how each individual paper relates to the other two: and will report / recommend within a common framework. The papers should explore the impact on British society;  compare/contrast with the values of other cultures (especially non-Western); how the issues are driven/influenced by the tug between secular and non-secular beliefs and by (a hidden?) financial resources agenda under the guise of 'rights', 'choice', 'control' and 'ethical/moral' considerations

 	



The completed research will form a report that details the findings, highlights good practice and outlines any recommendations. This report will be available to a variety of sources and will be launched at a Conference in February/March 2011 



















(a) Pressures that families / parents may face, during a pregnancy, to  

      terminate a life due to either impairment of the un-born child(foetus) or    

      the mother’s impairment 





This paper will investigate the issues relating to how health care professionals, especially hospitals, doctors, midwifes and others, place pressure on expectant mothers to terminate life if they perceive there will be no quality of life. It will investigate how pregnant women may be treated differently if they are disabled. It will look at how the media adds further pressure, and how political interventions influence this issue.



Over the past year there have been many pieces of research and debates in relation to the right to live: this paper would investigate the issues and pull together recommendations and suggested actions for future dissemination. 

 

The successful tender bid will be required to produce a number of key outputs as identified in Section 3c of this briefing document.







g)	The involuntary mercy killing of disabled people by professionals / paid carers / family members and friends 





Over the past year there have been articles and debates focused on the issues of lack of support and the pressures put on unpaid carers of disabled family members. 

There is a huge pressure on the unpaid carers of disabled family members. Providing 24 hour care is an exceptionally difficult, and stressful, task: this makes the adequate provision of support services, suitable to individual needs an absolute necessity. 







a)	The ‘Right to Die’ issues, euthanasia, and assisted suicide relating to disabled people. 











This final paper in the series looks at the issues around ‘The Right to die and assisted suicide in general’.  Over the past year we have seen the rise in television and press coverage of political and societies objections to people taking their own lives and many professionals have expressed their views as to how  disabled people should be allowed to have their feelings respected and be allowed to make their own independent choice. This paper should focus on the following:-





1.1	Whether disabled people have a right to have their own choice and to decide what they want to do, and when,

1.2	Differences between national and international legislation, and how legal systems treats people differently,

1.3	Ethical issues for the medical and the ‘caring’ professions,

1.4	Ethical issues for the individual and their families,

1.5	Individual’s rights for dignity and respect.







The Conference/ Seminars will offer a chance to present all three papers in a coordinated way, to identify good practice, and to make recommendations.







6. Contract supervision: the research will be coordinated by the Policy and Research Assistant at Breakthrough, whilst the manager of the contract will be the Head of Policy / Chief Executive





7. Indicative budget available: £2,000 per research paper





Production costs of the final version of the report will be retained by Breakthrough UK Ltd



________________End of message________________



This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).

Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]



Archives and tools are located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.





Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager