On 09/08/2010 01:49 PM, Rasmus Fogh wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Second that.
>
> I would suggest that the default behaviour should be as it is now, i.e.:
>
> - You cannot pick peaks in undisplayed regions. That is what was different
> in older versions.
> - Display regions automatically expand to show the real location of all
> peaks.
> - No warnings on expansion.
>
> Region expansion should be on by default for the same reason spell
> checking is on by default in Word: if it is off by default people who
> might need it willl never find it. Once you cannot pick in undisplayed
> regions, you would get expansion mainly on peak import or unaliasing.
>
> Do people think this makes sense?
>
> Rasmus
>
Hi Rasmus
that seems fine to me, I justs hadn't realised the behaviour had changed
in the latest version...
what version was Marcel usiing did he ever specify? If not could someone
ask him
regards
gary
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
> Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
> 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
>
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Tim Stevens wrote:
>
>
>>> Thanks to everyone for the quick answers and especially to Vicky, Gary
>>> and Brian for providing solution to the problem and explaining what
>>> exactly caused it.
>>>
>>
>>> Just for the record, I also agree with the numerous posts that there
>>> should be at least a message stating that CCPN is now going to alias the
>>> spectrum. Until now I wasn't even aware of the fact that analysis is
>>> capable to do this.
>>>
>> I want to make it 100% clear that what Brian and Gary described is how the
>> older versions used to function, but more recently things have been changed
>> so that you should not have any big spectrum tiling changes when picking
>> peaks.
>>
>> I do not know which version the initial comments relate to (that would be
>> helpful), but if it is 2.1.5 and peak picking does affect the spectrum
>> tiling, we need to know about this because it is a bug and shouldn't happen
>> at all. Hence, adding warnings in this situation is a moot point.
>>
>> Maybe some warnings are missing for other ways of (un)aliasing peaks, but I
>> can only make adjustments if the problem is present in the latest version,
>> and it is known what triggered the tiling change. (The actual spectrum
>> changes are somewhat removed from the causal operations)
>>
>> Lastly, if the spectrum bounds changed it is probably an indication that a
>> peak is in the wrong place, so this needs to looked into.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
>> Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
>> University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office)
>> 80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
>> Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
>> Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
>> United Kingdom http://www.ccpn.ac.uk
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2-
>> -------
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Gary Thompson [Homans Lab Research Coordinator]
Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology,
University of Leeds,
Leeds, LS2 9JT, West-Yorkshire, UK Tel. +44-113-3433024
email: [log in to unmask] Fax +44-113-3431935
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|