> of the data, variance or coordinate values from other NDFs. However
> it's a bit out of date in that it has not been updated to use the
> modern WCS system - it still uses the old AXIS system.
Shouldn't WA-W% for the WCS co-ordinates be on the ToDo list?
> A bit convoluted I know. It would have been simpler for the meaning of
> each "c*" token to be fixed - ca for the first axis, cb for the second
> etc. But it's history now...
It seemed sensible at the time in keeping with the other tokens. It was
easier to code too.
Malcolm
|