Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Why do you think using double instead of float is that much more time >>> consuming? (I do understand that a naive calculation says it takes twice as >>> much time to write/read the data.) >> >> The naive calculations has proven to be correct :) >> >>> If you found the place in the code to turn off the deletion of the >>> residuals, maybe you could find the place in the code where SPM uses double >>> and change it to float? >> >> I ended up converting to float32 using fslmath. I prefer to change SPM >> code as little as possible (because it is hard to maintain your own >> version). >> >> BTW - can I make a feature request? Could saving residuals be an >> option I could set somewhere? This way I would not have to patch my >> SPM version each time there is a new release. >> >> Thanks! >> Chris >> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Flandin, PhD > Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging > University College London > 12 Queen Square > London WC1N 3BG > >[log in to unmask] |