I still find lists useful. I have a pretty efficient system for
deleting irrelevant posts. Most posts are candidates for deletion. A
very small minority of 'golden eggs' are interesting and make it
worthwhile - for the time being.
All the best,
David.
On 10 August 2010 14:45, Helen Barrell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I thought it meant that she'd suspended him pending a discussion with him, now that so many people have come forward to air their annoyance with his posts. The fact that no posts have come bursting forth from him since this happened did seem to suggest that he'd been removed from the list by the admin, as they are now aware of the problem.
>
> It is an interesting debate, and it does make me wonder if email lists are still a valid and useful method for communicating online. I remember being in lists back in the late 90s to pursue my personal interests and not a day went by when someone wasn't complaining that someone else was posting something that was irrelevant, or someone didn't like the amount someone else was posting. Then people moved onto forums, and sometimes you could screen whose posts you read. And now forums are dead and Twitter and Facebook have taken over, presumably because you are so much more in control of who you interact with. So it's rather ironic that someone posting about Web 2.0 and the "e-joys" of Twitter should have sparked a riot on an email list. I'm sure there's a dissertation in all this somewhere....
>
> If anything, I enjoyed the musicals: Spam-a-Mia was a particular favourite. In the same spirit, classic literature mash-ups spring to mind, such as "Vanity Spam", "Wuthering Spam" and "Spam & Spamability"!
>
>
>
> Helen Barrell
> Library Services Assistant Manager
> Barber Fine Art & Music Libraries
> Library Services
> Academic Services
> University of Birmingham
> Birmingham
> B15 2TS
>
> Tel: 0121 414 5851
> [log in to unmask]
> www.library.bham.ac.uk
>
> The contents of this email may be privileged and confidential. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor copied in any way. If received in error, please notify the sender and then delete it from your system. Should you communicate with me by email, you consent to the University of Birmingham monitoring and reading any such correspondance.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Salter
> Sent: 10 August 2010 14:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LIS-LINK] (ll) Scholarship 2.0 Facebook
>
> Just another thought (sorry for the clutter!)
> In Kirsty's reply, she states:
> "Gerry's mail access to the list is currently suspended, and I'll try and email him to see if I get a response - incorporating some helpful suggestions."
>
> What does this actually mean?
> Does he not receive mail from the list - but has the ability to post to it?
> If so, isn't this tantamount to spam? Sending messages in a fire-and-forget fashion without regard for replies to them?
>
> Is he the quintessential anti-lurker?
> I'm sure there are many subscribers to this list who 'lurk' - reading the discussions/pleas for help/interesting links without ever posting a reply (as I was for a while). GMcK seems to be the opposite of this - observing none of the list and posting more than most!
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kat Nower
> Sent: 10 August 2010 14:08
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: (ll) Scholarship 2.0 Facebook
>
> Just to respond to this with the results of the 'Gerry' survey so far, it looks like most people agree with Alan.
>
> 1) Nothing, I'm happy to receive them/delete them as I receive them
> 21.2% 61
> 2) Set up a LIS-Gerry email group for those that wish to subscribe
> 31.6% 91
> 3) Gerry should be removed from the LIS-LINK group
> 47.2% 136
>
> Although I appreciate that the answers are not necessarily mutually exclusive (i.e. it's possible to agree with both 2 & 3- my mistake!), perhaps it would be best for Gerry's freedom of expression if he refrained from emailing the LIS-LINK group, and instead set up his own JISCMAIL list.
> This would allow discussions about his email threads, and prevent people from sending 'Reply to all' responses which seem to be upsetting others.
>
> If anyone else wants to do the survey, it's here:
>
> http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GerryMcKiernan
>
>
> I'll send the results to the LIS-LINK administrators at the end of the week.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Exelby Alan Mr
> (LIB)
> Sent: 10 August 2010 13:49
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: (ll) Scholarship 2.0 Facebook
>
> Sorry, I cannot agree; this response itself loses all perspective. No-one is depriving Gerry McK of his right to freedom of expression, but freedom of expression does not require that other people have to pay attention to that expression. To put in the context of the print technologies when these rights were developed: you can print what you like, but no-one else is obliged to buy or read what you say. Given the special conditions for the net, there are special rules, which include the principle that postings to mail lists should be relevant to the topic of the list; and other subscribers are perfectly within their rights to complain about posts they do not believe are within those rules. Trying to frame this in terms of freedom of expression is going way overboard.
>
> For myself, I delete his posts unread due to their uncritical technophilia (along with unintelligible postings by other persons), but given the scale of rubbish I receive, I don't find this especially onerous - but there are often far more than "less than 1 a day", and I would certainly be glad to see them stopped.
>
> Alan
>
> ==============================
> Mr A.V. Exelby,
> Systems/Databases Librarian.
> The Library,
> University of East Anglia,
> Norwich, NR4 7TJ
>
> Tel.: 01603 592432
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
> Information Services
> ================================
> "Man, who'd have thought being a librarian could be so tough"
> Seamus Harper, in 'Harper 2.0', "Andromeda".
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and
>>discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Kane
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:10 PM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: (ll) Scholarship 2.0 Facebook
>>
>>Agreed.
>>
>>I don't like this.
>>
>>When herd mentality like this kicks in, tolerance, freedom of
>>expression and compassion get kicked out. We lose humanity and our
>>sense of perspective in the hysteria. It's how we fail as a species,
>>on a bigger scale, with wars and the like.
>>
>>The correct perspective is that we are dealing with less than 1 message
>>per day.
>>
>>The correct thing to do is to treat all people with dignity and
>>respect.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>David.
>>
>>
>>On 10 August 2010 10:54, Lindsay, John M <[log in to unmask]>
>>wrote:
>>> The response to the occasional email from the list owner on Facebook
>>above fascinates. There is hardly a message a day. I find the bot who
>>owns the Facebook group responds fairly frequently, and sufficiently
>>intelligently, that Turing would be impressed. Deleting messages that
>>you don't want to read, about ten a day on lis-link, is done easily and
>>collectively in digest mode, it isn't hard work. The messages on
>>scholarship 2.0 are often telling me something I didn't know, and
>>occasionally useful or I want to follow them. The same sort of thing
>>happens on the KIDMM list. This is the first time I've seen a lis-link
>>thread develop a discussion (these are called discussion lists for a
>>reason) and I am stunned by parts of the community committed to freedom
>>of expression and access to information
>>(1948) responding in a manner of managerialism?
>>>
>>>
>>> At some stage, I presume, in the best tradition of Niemoller,
>>someone will start a thread about my occasional matters of politics,
>>gardening, ISKO, PRADSA, concept theory, walking, public transport, and
>>threads which someone doesn't see the connection with that particular
>>flavour of lis-linking, such as linked data?
>>>
>>>
>>> I do notice this list is about information science, rather than
>>services, and to be a science means a particular matter for technical
>>change.
>>>
>>>
>>> Approaching an employer I find simply scandalous, and unethical.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>David Kane, MLIS.
>>Systems Librarian
>>Waterford Institute of Technology
>>Ireland
>>http://library.wit.ie/
>>T: ++353.51302838
>>M: ++353.876693212
>
--
David Kane, MLIS.
Systems Librarian
Waterford Institute of Technology
Ireland
http://library.wit.ie/
T: ++353.51302838
M: ++353.876693212
|