Hi,
Can you please describe any differences between implementing TBSS randomise in FSL 4.1.6 using --twopass and implementing TBSS randomise in previous releases with -N (apart from the obvious difference in command line call)? Or do these two options do the same exact thing?
I am trying to determine whether it is necessary to download FSL 4.1.6 and rerun all of my stats (which involves many ROIs) using --twopass, or if it is appropriate to be satisfied with the results using -N.
Thank you,
Amelia
-----Original Message-----
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ?? ?
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 8:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [FSL] non-stationarity correction in randomise
Hi Matthew,
Thanks. It works.
Jun
> Hello,
> This command line call for non-stationarity correction changed to --twopass in FSL 4.1.6.
>
> Many Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>> Dear FSL experts,
>>
>> I wanted to try the non-stationarity correction option of the randomise newly implemented in the latest version, as mentioned in this forum.
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1005&L=FSL&P=R31687&1=FSL&9=A&I=-3&J=on&X=4D5A2E67D2864BE9A3&Y=steve%40fmrib.ox.ac.uk&d=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches&z=4
>> I downloaded the patch to FSL 4.1.6, and ran randomise 2.6 for TBSS data with -N option. However, it output the null distribution text files, not the files with "n" in their names like "tfcen". How can I turn on the "hidden" non-stationarity correction option? Or should I use the different version of randomise?
>>
>> I'm using FSL on MacPro, Snow Leopard OS.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Jun Miyata
>> Department of Neuropsychiatry
>> Graduate School of Medicine
>> Kyoto University
>>
>
|