Hi,
I am currently running a subject-level anaylsis with FEAT across 99 subjects. When examining the logs of the analyses there are two things that appear odd in the registration:
1) after (roughly) subject 45, the orientation of the brain in the registration of example_func to highres switches (in order) from
4 sagittal slices- 4 coronal slices - 4 axial slices
to
4 coronal slices (rotated 45 degrees, as viewed in FEAT display) - 4 axial slices (rotated 45 degrees) - 4 sagittal slices (rotated 90 degrees)
2) in roughly half of the post-subject 45 analyses, the registration of example_func to highres lacks any red outlining whatsoever. Frankly, I do not know what the outlining indicates but, as with the issue 1 above, I am wondering if weither of these developments represent an issue in our analysis (either at the subject level or in the final analysis)?
--Joe
|