On 29 Aug 2010, at 19:16, Mark Weiss wrote:
> What Adam means, I think, is limited to derivatives of the
> application of social science theories by French critics and their
> anglophone companions.
Well yes he does, but - and I know I am repeating myself here - my
argument with him over that would centre on the ways in which theory
can be energetic and inspiring in one context and deadening and static
in another.
Cheers
Tim A.
|